Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34320016›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Evaluating the impact of multivariate imputation by MICE in feature selection.

Maritza Mera-Gaona, Ursula Neumann, Rubiel Vargas-Canas, Diego M López

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prediction models for COVID-19 disease outcomes.Emerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maritza Mera-GaonaUniversity of Cauca, Colombia, Popayán, Cauca, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-8511-213X
Ursula NeumannData Science and Optimization, Fraunhofer Center for Applied Research on Supply Chain Services SCS, Nuremberg, Bayern, Germany.
Rubiel Vargas-CanasUniversity of Cauca, Colombia, Popayán, Cauca, Colombia.
Diego M LópezUniversity of Cauca, Colombia, Popayán, Cauca, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Handling missing values is a crucial step in preprocessing data in Machine Learning. Most available algorithms for analyzing datasets in the feature selection process and classification or estimation process analyze complete datasets. Consequently, in many cases, the strategy for dealing with missing values is to use only instances with full data or to replace missing values with a mean, mode, median, or a constant value. Usually, discarding missing samples or replacing missing values by means of fundamental techniques causes bias in subsequent analyzes on datasets.

aimDemonstrate the positive impact of multivariate imputation in the feature selection process on datasets with missing values.

resultsWe compared the effects of the feature selection process using complete datasets, incomplete datasets with missingness rates between 5 and 50%, and imputed datasets by basic techniques and multivariate imputation. The feature selection algorithms used are well-known methods. The results showed that the datasets imputed by multivariate imputation obtained the best results in feature selection compared to datasets imputed by basic techniques or non-imputed incomplete datasets.

conclusionsConsidering the results obtained in the evaluation, applying multivariate imputation by MICE reduces bias in the feature selection process.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHumansSelection BiasSoftware

Identifiers

PMID34320016
PMCPMC8318311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.