Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34320009›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Characterization of structural changes in modern and archaeological burnt bone: Implications for differential preservation bias.

Giulia Gallo, Matthew Fyhrie, Cleantha Paine, Sergey V Ushakov, Masami Izuho, Byambaa Gunchinsuren, Nicolas Zwyns, Alexandra Navrotsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giulia GalloDepartment of Anthropology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7898-2866
Matthew FyhrieDepartment of Anthropology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1886-6294
Cleantha PaineArchaeology Institute University of the Highlands and Islands, Kirkwall, United Kingdom.
Sergey V UshakovSchool of Molecular Sciences and Center for Materials of the Universe, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.
Masami IzuhoTokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Byambaa GunchinsurenInstitute for History and Archaeology, Mongolia Academy of Science, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Nicolas ZwynsDepartment of Anthropology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Alexandra NavrotskySchool of Molecular Sciences and Center for Materials of the Universe, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural and thermodynamic factors which may influence burnt bone survivorship in archaeological contexts have not been fully described. A highly controlled experimental reference collection of fresh, modern bone burned in temperature increments 100-1200˚C is presented here to document the changes to bone tissue relevant to preservation using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. Specific parameters investigated here include the rate of organic loss, amount of bone mineral recrystallization, and average growth in bone mineral crystallite size. An archaeological faunal assemblage ca. 30,000 years ago from Tolbor-17 (Mongolia) is additionally considered to confirm visibility of changes seen in the modern reference sample and to relate structural changes to commonly used zooarchaeological scales of burning intensity. The timing of our results indicates that the loss of organic components in both modern and archaeological bone burnt to temperatures up to 700˚C are not accompanied by growth changes in the average crystallite size of bone mineral bioapatite, leaving the small and reactive bioapatite crystals of charred and carbonized bone exposed to diagenetic agents in depositional contexts. For bones burnt to temperatures of 700˚C and above, two major increases in average crystallite size are noted which effectively decrease the available surface area of bone mineral crystals, decreasing reactivity and offering greater thermodynamic stability despite the mechanical fragility of calcined bone. We discuss the archaeological implications of these observations within the context of Tolbor-17 and the challenges of identifying anthropogenic fire.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyBone and BonesHot TemperatureHumansMongoliaPreservation, BiologicalSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredX-Ray Diffraction

Identifiers

PMID34320009
PMCPMC8318310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.