Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34320007›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Basking shark sub-surface behaviour revealed by animal-towed cameras.

Jessica L Rudd, Tiago Bartolomeu, Haley R Dolton, Owen M Exeter, Christopher Kerry, Lucy A Hawkes, Suzanne M Henderson, Marcus Shirley, Matthew J Witt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessica L RuddHatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, College of Life & Environmental Sciences, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4512-7999
Tiago BartolomeuCEiiA, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Haley R DoltonEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8550-7289
Owen M ExeterEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, United Kingdom.
Christopher KerryEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0276-9775
Lucy A HawkesHatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, College of Life & Environmental Sciences, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Suzanne M HendersonNatureScot, Inverness, United Kingdom.
Marcus ShirleyMrROV, Wadebride, Cornwall, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7912-1283
Matthew J WittHatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, College of Life & Environmental Sciences, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While biologging tags have answered a wealth of ecological questions, the drivers and consequences of movement and activity often remain difficult to ascertain, particularly marine vertebrates which are difficult to observe directly. Basking sharks, the second largest shark species in the world, aggregate in the summer in key foraging sites but despite advances in biologging technologies, little is known about their breeding ecology and sub-surface behaviour. Advances in camera technologies holds potential for filling in these knowledge gaps by providing environmental context and validating behaviours recorded with conventional telemetry. Six basking sharks were tagged at their feeding site in the Sea of Hebrides, Scotland, with towed cameras combined with time-depth recorders and satellite telemetry. Cameras recorded a cumulative 123 hours of video data over an average 64-hour deployment and confirmed the position of the sharks within the water column. Feeding events only occurred within a metre depth and made up ¾ of the time spent swimming near the surface. Sharks maintained similar tail beat frequencies regardless of whether feeding, swimming near the surface or the seabed, where they spent surprisingly up to 88% of daylight hours. This study reported the first complete breaching event and the first sub-surface putative courtship display, with nose-to-tail chasing, parallel swimming as well as the first observation of grouping behaviour near the seabed. Social groups of sharks are thought to be very short term and sporadic, and may play a role in finding breeding partners, particularly in solitary sharks which may use aggregations as an opportunity to breed. In situ observation of basking sharks at their seasonal aggregation site through animal borne cameras revealed unprecedented insight into the social and environmental context of basking shark behaviour which were previously limited to surface observations.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSharksVideo RecordingAnimalsFeeding BehaviorFemaleMaleSatellite CommunicationsScotlandSwimming

Identifiers

PMID34320007
PMCPMC8318306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.