Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34319981›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Developing a model for estimating the activity of colonic microbes after intestinal surgeries.

Andrew Marcus, Taylor L Davis, Bruce E Rittmann, John K DiBaise, Elvis A Carnero, Karen Corbin, Steven R Smith, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew MarcusBiodesign Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3442-6088
Taylor L DavisBiodesign Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.
Bruce E RittmannBiodesign Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.
John K DiBaiseDivision of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States of America.
Elvis A CarneroTranslational Research Institute, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, United States of America.
Karen CorbinTranslational Research Institute, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, United States of America.
Steven R SmithTranslational Research Institute, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, United States of America.
Rosa Krajmalnik-BrownBiodesign Center for Health Through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.
Arizona State University · USAdventHealth Orlando · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Integrating quantitative energetics determines the microbiome's contribution to energy balanceR01DK105829 · NIDDK · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KRAJMALNIK-BROWN, ROSA, SMITH, STEVEN RICHARD · 2016 to 2020
$3.5M
Role of Human Intestinal Microbiota on Success of Surgical Weight Loss ProceduresR01DK090379 · NIDDK · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI DIBAISE, JOHN K., KRAJMALNIK-BROWN, ROSA · 2011 to 2014
$1.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK090379NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK105829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe large intestine provides a compensatory role in energy recovery when surgical interventions such as extensive small intestinal resections or bypass operations lower the efficiency of nutrient absorption in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. While microorganisms in the colon are known to play vital roles in recovering energy, their contributions remain to be qualified and quantified in the small intestine resection.

objectiveWe develop a mathematical model that links nutrient absorption in the upper and lower GI tract in two steps.

methodsFirst, we describe the effects of small intestine resection on the ileocecal output (ICO), which enters the colon and provides food for microbes. Second, we describe energy recovered by the colon's microorganisms via short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production. We obtain model parameters by performing a least-squares regression analysis on clinical data for subjects with normal physiology and those who had undergone small intestine resection.

resultsFor subjects with their intestines intact, our model provided a metabolizable energy value that aligns well with the traditional Atwater coefficients. With removal of the small intestine, physiological absorption became less efficient, and the metabolizable energy decreased. In parallel, the inefficiencies in physiological absorption by the small intestine are partly compensated by production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) from proteins and carbohydrates by microorganisms in the colon. The colon recovered more than half of the gross energy intake when the entire small intestine was removed. Meanwhile, the quality of energy absorbed changed, because microbe-derived SCFAs, not the original components of food, become the dominant form of absorbed energy.

conclusionThe mathematical model developed here provides an important framework for describing the effect of clinical interventions on the colon's microorganisms.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeColonFecesFemaleHumansIntestine, SmallMaleModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID34319981
PMCPMC8318292
OpenAlexW3183880804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.