Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34319810›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021

Medical adhesive vs hookwire for computed tomography-guided preoperative localization and risk factors of major complications.

Weitao Ye, Chenyu Dong, Churong Lin, Qidi Wu, Jiao Li, Zihao Zhou, Menghuang Wen, Changhong Liang, Zhenjun Zhao, Lin Yang

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Weitao YeDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chenyu DongDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Churong LinDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qidi WuDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiao LiDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zihao ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Menghuang WenDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Changhong LiangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhenjun ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lin YangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy of medical adhesive and hookwire as CT-guided non-palpable pulmonary nodule (NPN) localization methods before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) resection, and determine the risk factors for common complications during localization.

methodsThis was a single-center non-randomized retrospective study. 102 consecutive patients with 109 NPNs were divided into Group A (medical adhesive, 66 patients, 72 nodules) and Group B (hookwire, 36 patients, 37 nodules) before VATS. Patient- and nodule-based characteristics were compared. Logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors for complications.

resultsLocalization was successfully performed in all the NPNs. For Group A, the rate of pneumothorax immediately after localization was lower (

conclusionCompared with hookwire, localization with medical adhesive excelled in lower risk of pneumothorax, a more flexible localization-to-surgery interval, and had similar rates of hemorrhage after needle withdrawal. Hookwire is an independent risk factor of pneumothorax immediately after localization. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study added new clinical evidence to the efficacy of medical adhesive in pre-operative CT-guided NPN localization.

Indexed as

AdhesivesFemaleHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Pulmonary NodulesPreoperative CareRadiography, InterventionalRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSolitary Pulmonary NoduleThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdhesives

Identifiers

PMID34319810
PMCPMC9327762
OpenAlexW3184202141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.