ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2021
Crop rotation reduces the frequency of anaerobic soil bacteria in Red Latosol of Brazil.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of light intensity on the Panax quinquefolius L. growth and soil microbial communities under reduced light spatial heterogeneity: an application to agroforestry systems.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Crop rotation and inoculation increase soil bradyrhizobia population, soybean grain yields, and profitability.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023Article
- Distinct prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities and networks in two agricultural fields of central Japan with different histories of maize-cabbage rotation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crop diversity affects the processes of soil physical structuring and most likely provokes changes in the frequencies of soil microbial communities. The study was conducted for soil prokaryotic diversity sequencing 16S rDNA genes from a 25-year no-tillage experiment comprised of two crop systems: crop succession (Triticum aestivum-Glycine max) and rotation (Vicia sativa-Zea mays-Avena sativa-Glycine max-Triticum aestivum-Glycine max). The hypothesis was that a crop system with higher crop diversification (rotation) would affect the frequencies of prokaryotic taxa against a less diverse crop system (succession) altering the major soil functions guided by bacterial diversity. Soils in both crop systems were dominated by Proteobacteria (31%), Acidobacteria (23%), Actinobacteria (10%), and Gemmatimonadetes (7.2%), among other common copiotrophic soil bacteria. Crop systems did not affect the richness and diversity indexes of soil bacteria and soil archaea. However, the crop rotation system reduced only the frequencies of anaerobic metabolism bacteria Chloroacidobacteria, Holophagae, Spirochaetes, Euryarchaeota, and Crenarchaeota. It can be concluded that crop succession, a system that is poorer in root diversity over time, may have conditioned the soil to lower oxygen diffusion and built up ecological niches that suitable for anaerobic bacteria tolerating lower levels of oxygen. On the other hand, it appeared that crop rotation has restructured the soil over the years while enabling copiotrophic aerobic bacteria to dominate the soil ecosystem. The changes prompted by crop succession have implications for efficient soil organic matter decomposition, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, higher root activity, and overall soil productivity, which compromise to agriculture sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.