Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34319560›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

Bundled Payment Episodes Initiated by Physician Group Practices: Medicare Beneficiary Perceptions of Care Quality.

Sean R McClellan, Matthew J Trombley, Jaclyn Marshall, Daver Kahvecioglu, Colleen M Kummet, Christine LaRocca, Laura Dummit, Andrea Hassol

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sean R McClellanAbt Associates, Cambridge, MA, USA. Sean_McClellan@abtassoc.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3355-343X
Matthew J TrombleyAbt Associates, Durham, NC, USA.
Jaclyn MarshallBind Benefits, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Daver KahveciogluCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Colleen M KummetGeneral Dynamics Information Technology, West Des Moines, IA, USA.
Christine LaRoccaTelligen, Greenwood Village, CO, USA.
Laura DummitLewin Group, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
Andrea HassolAbt Associates, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Abt Global (United States) · USCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · USGeneral Dynamics (United States) · USLewin Group (United States) · USTelligen · US

Funding

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (US) HHSM-500-2011-00001L, TASK ORDER HHSM-500-T0007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative incentivizes participating providers to reduce total Medicare payments for an episode of care. However, there are concerns that reducing payments could reduce quality of care.

objectiveTo assess the association of BPCI with patient-reported functional status and care experiences.

designWe surveyed a stratified random sample of Medicare beneficiaries with BPCI episodes attributed to participating physician group practices, and matched comparison beneficiaries, after hospitalization for one of the 18 highest volume clinical episodes. The sample included beneficiaries discharged from the hospital from February 2017 through September 2017. Beneficiaries were surveyed approximately 90 days after their hospital discharge. We estimated risk-adjusted differences between the BPCI and comparison groups, pooled across all 18 clinical episodes and separately for the five largest clinical episodes.

participantsMedicare beneficiaries with BPCI episodes (n=16,898, response rate=44.5%) and comparison beneficiaries hospitalized for similar conditions selected using coarsened exact matching (n=14,652, response rate=46.2%). MAIN MEASURES: Patient-reported functional status, care experiences, and overall satisfaction with recovery. KEY

resultsOverall, we did not find differences between the BPCI and comparison respondents across seven measures of change in functional status or overall satisfaction with recovery. Both BPCI and comparison respondents reported generally positive care experiences, but BPCI respondents were less likely to report positive care experience for 3 of 8 measures (discharged at the right time, -1.2 percentage points (pp); appropriate level of care, -1.8 pp; preferences for post-discharge care taken into account, -0.9 pp; p<0.05 for all three measures).

conclusionsThe proportion of respondents with favorable care experiences was smaller for BPCI than comparison respondents. However, we did not detect differences in self-reported change in functional status approximately 90 days after hospital discharge, indicating that differences in care experiences did not affect functional recovery.

Indexed as

Group PracticePhysiciansAftercareAgedHumansMedicarePatient DischargeQuality of Health CareReimbursement MechanismsUnited Statesbundled paymentscare experiencesevaluationfunctional statusMedicarepatient-reported outcomessurvey researchvalue-based payment models

Identifiers

PMID34319560
PMCPMC8971231
OpenAlexW3183287681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.