Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34319533›Full record

ArticleScience China. Life sciences2022

Facing small and biased data dilemma in drug discovery with enhanced federated learning approaches.

Zhaoping Xiong, Ziqiang Cheng, Xinyuan Lin, Chi Xu, Xiaohong Liu, Dingyan Wang, Xiaomin Luo, Yong Zhang, Hualiang Jiang, Nan Qiao and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Federated Learning: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhaoping Xiong *Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, and School of Life Science and Technology, Shanghai Tech University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Ziqiang Cheng *Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, and School of Life Science and Technology, Shanghai Tech University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Xinyuan Lin *Laboratory of Health Intelligence, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518100, China.
Chi Xu *Laboratory of Health Intelligence, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518100, China.
Xiaohong LiuShanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, and School of Life Science and Technology, Shanghai Tech University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Dingyan WangDrug Discovery and Design Center, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Xiaomin LuoDrug Discovery and Design Center, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Yong ZhangLaboratory of Health Intelligence, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518100, China.
Hualiang JiangShanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, and School of Life Science and Technology, Shanghai Tech University, Shanghai, 200031, China. hljiang@simm.ac.cn.
Nan QiaoLaboratory of Health Intelligence, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518100, China. qiaonan3@huawei.com.
Mingyue ZhengDrug Discovery and Design Center, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201203, China. myzheng@simm.ac.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) models usually require large amounts of high-quality training data, which is in striking contrast to the situation of small and biased data faced by current drug discovery pipelines. The concept of federated learning has been proposed to utilize distributed data from different sources without leaking sensitive information of the data. This emerging decentralized machine learning paradigm is expected to dramatically improve the success rate of AI-powered drug discovery. Here, we simulated the federated learning process with different property and activity datasets from different sources, among which overlapping molecules with high or low biases exist in the recorded values. Beyond the benefit of gaining more data, we also demonstrated that federated training has a regularization effect superior to centralized training on the pooled datasets with high biases. Moreover, different network architectures for clients and aggregation algorithms for coordinators have been compared on the performance of federated learning, where personalized federated learning shows promising results. Our work demonstrates the applicability of federated learning in predicting drug-related properties and highlights its promising role in addressing the small and biased data dilemma in drug discovery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DiscoveryAlgorithmsDatasets as TopicERG1 Potassium ChannelERG1 Potassium ChannelKCNH2 protein, humandrug discoveryFedAMPfederated learningNon-IID data

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.