Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34319515›Full record

ReviewArchives of osteoporosis2021

Denosumab in chronic kidney disease: a narrative review of treatment efficacy and safety.

Aquila Gopaul, Tharsan Kanagalingam, Jenny Thain, Tayyab Khan, Andrea Cowan, Nabil Sultan, Kristin K Clemens

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of osteoporosis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab: Insights beyond 10 Years of Use.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. IMPC-based screening revealed thatFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Mineral Bone Disorders in Kidney Disease Patients: The Ever-Current Topic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Secondary Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aquila GopaulCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Tharsan KanagalingamSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Jenny ThainDivision of Geriatrics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Tayyab KhanDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Andrea CowanSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Nabil SultanDivision of Nephrology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Kristin K ClemensDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Western University, London, ON, Canada. kristin.clemens@sjhc.london.on.ca.
Western University · CALondon Health Sciences Centre · CASt Joseph's Health Care · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk of bone fractures. In this review, we summarize the complexity of fracture prevention in CKD, describe the usefulness of a medication called denosumab, and review its safety in this population. Our article will help doctors manage brittle bones in CKD and encourage researchers to conduct more studies to improve bone health in CKD. PURPOSE: Patients with CKD are at increased risk of fragility fractures and associated consequences. We discuss the complexity of fracture prevention in CKD, summarize the efficacy and safety of denosumab, and provide an approach to denosumab-induced hypocalcemia.

methodsUsing predefined terms, we searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar for studies on fracture prevention in CKD and the efficacy and safety of denosumab. We included observational studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, evidence-based reviews, and clinical practice guidelines.

resultsThe diagnosis of osteoporosis and prevention of related fragility fractures is complex in CKD, particularly in those with advanced and end-staged kidney disease (ESKD). Prior to initiating denosumab, it is important to assess for and optimize CKD-mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBD). In observational studies and small RCTs, denosumab has been shown to improve bone mineral density and reduce bone turnover in CKD, but there have been no studies focused upon its fracture efficacy. Denosumab-induced hypocalcemia has also been reported, which disproportionately impacts those with ESKD. Risk factors for hypocalcemia with denosumab use in CKD include lower baseline serum calcium and 25 hydroxyvitamin D and both low and high bone turnover. Choosing the "right patient" for denosumab, supplementing with calcium and vitamin D, adjusting calcium dialysate, and close clinical monitoring are essential if considering this drug.

conclusionWith optimization of CKD-MBD, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and close monitoring, denosumab can be considered in CKD. There are however opportunities to better understand its fracture efficacy and safety in an RCT setting.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicBone DensityDenosumabHumansTreatment OutcomeBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDenosumabFractureHypocalcemiaKidneyOsteoporosisSafety

Identifiers

PMID34319515
OpenAlexW3186238060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.