Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34319510›Full record

Trial reportStem cell reviews and reports2021

Clinical experience on umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell treatment in 210 severe and critical COVID-19 cases in Turkey.

Nesrin O Ercelen, Kubra Cigdem Pekkoc-Uyanik, Nagihan Alpaydin, Gokay Rasit Gulay, Murat Simsek

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Stem cell-based therapy for human diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  19. Immune-based therapeutic approaches in COVID-19.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nesrin O ErcelenDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Haliç University, İstanbul, Turkey. nesrinercelen@gmail.com.
Kubra Cigdem Pekkoc-UyanikDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Haliç University, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1056-960X
Nagihan AlpaydinAtigen - Cell Technology Center, Trabzon, Turkey.
Gokay Rasit GulayAtigen - Cell Technology Center, Trabzon, Turkey.
Murat SimsekGeneis, Genetic System Solutions, İstanbul, Turkey.
Haliç University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTreatment for COVID-19 is still urgent need for the critically ill and severe cases. UC-MSC administration has a therapeutic benefit for severe COVID-19 patients even in the recovery period. In this paper, we aimed to present our clinical experience with UC-MSC treatment in severe and critical severe COVID-19 patients.

methodsIn this study we evaluated the clinical outcome of severe/critically severe 210 COVID-19 patients treated with UC-MSCs, 1-2 × 10

resultsOut of 99 critically severe intubated patients we have observed good clinical progress/discharged from ICU in 52 (52.5%) patients. Where as 86 (77.5%) of 111 severe unintubated patients discharged from ICU. Intubated 47 (47.5%) patients and unintubated 25 (22.5%) patients pass away. Significantly higher survival was observed in patients who underwent UC-MSCs before intubation (OR = 1.475, 95% CI = 1.193-1.824 p < 0.001). It was observed that the SaO

conclusionsAccording to our results and from recent studies, UC-MSC treatment is safe with high potential to be used as an added therapeutic treatment for severe COVID-19 patients. Our experience showed that UC-MSC therapy may restore oxygenation and downregulate cytokine storm in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. We advice wider randomised studies to discover the detailed therapeutic pathophysiology of the MSCs on COVID-19 patients. MSCs transplantation improves the damaging effects of the cytokine storm through immunomodulation and improving tissue and organ repair. Severe patients who were unintubated were in the Phase I, while critical patients who were intubated were in the Phase II. The figure is created via biorender application, ( BioRender.com ).

Indexed as

Cord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAllograftsCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexTurkeyCOVID-19Cytokine stormImmunomodulatory effectsMSCsSARS-CoV-2Stem cell therapy

Identifiers

PMID34319510
PMCPMC8317476
OpenAlexW3172378545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.