Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34319467›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021

Closing the gap: evidence-based surgical treatment of rectus diastasis associated with abdominal wall hernias.

H ElHawary, N Barone, D Zammit, J E Janis

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Mesh suture repair of rectus diastasis with and without a concurrent ventral hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Diastasis recti abdominis: A comprehensive review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Linea alba 3D morphometric variability by CT scan exploration.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H ElHawaryDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
N BaroneFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
D ZammitDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
J E JanisDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 915 Olentangy River Road, Suite 2100, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA. Jeffrey.Janis@osumc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6103-4798
McGill University Health Centre · CAThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRectus diastasis (RD) associated with abdominal hernias present a surgical challenge associated with a paucity in treatment guidelines. The objective of this systematic review is to review surgical techniques and assess complication and recurrence rates of RD in patients with concurrent abdominal hernias.

methodsPubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched, and data extraction was performed on articles which met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses of complication and recurrence rates were performed to compare open vs. minimally invasive surgery. Student t tests were performed to compare differences in continuous outcomes.

resultsTwenty-eight studies were included in this review. RD can be surgically repaired by both open and laparoscopic approaches using both non-absorbable and absorbable sutures. The majority of the techniques reported included mesh insertion either above the aponeurosis, retromuscular, preperitoneal, or intraperitoneal. Open techniques, compared to laparoscopic approaches, were associated with a significantly higher rate of skin dehiscence (6.79% vs. 2.86%; p = 0.003) and hematoma formation (4.73% vs. 1.09%; p < 0.001) and a significantly lower rate of post-operative seroma formation (2.47% vs. 8.29%; p < 0.001). No significant difference in RD recurrence rates were observed between open and laparoscopic repair (0.22 vs. 0.63%, p = 0.17).

conclusionBoth open and laparoscopic surgery are safe and effective methods that can be used to repair RD in patients with RD and concurrent abdominal hernias as evident by the low recurrence and complication rates and almost negligible major complications post repair.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallHernia, AbdominalLaparoscopyHerniorrhaphyHumansRecurrenceSeromaSurgical MeshSuturesAbdominal herniasComplication ratesLaparoscopicRectus diastasis

Identifiers

PMID34319467
OpenAlexW3184862723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.