Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34319448›Full record

Observational studyRheumatology international2021

Decrease in handgrip strength in rheumatoid arthritis (RA): is there a sex-related difference?

Nikolino Žura, Marta Vukorepa, Ivan Jurak, Porin Perić, Jasmina Botonjić, Andreja Matijević, Helena Kolar Mitrović, Nadica Laktašić Žerjavić, Kristina Kovač Durmiš, Nataša Kalebota and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Rheumatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Handgrip strength testing in rheumatic diseases.Rheumatology international · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Respiratory Muscle Strength in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nikolino ŽuraDepartment for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8693-9649
Marta VukorepaSpecial Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation Varaždinske Toplice, Varaždinske Toplice, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5823-5556
Ivan JurakUniversity of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7682-6077
Porin PerićDepartment for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. porin.peric@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7416-1868
Jasmina BotonjićUniversity of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2081-4469
Andreja MatijevićDepartment for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8240-3150
Helena Kolar MitrovićDepartment for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0267-9427
Nadica Laktašić ŽerjavićDepartment for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1279-3928
Kristina Kovač DurmišDepartment for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8716-4654
Nataša KalebotaDepartment for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6835-8752
Iva ŽagarDepartment for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2168-7078
Ivan Ljudevit CaktašDepartment for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8793-9349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis occurs two to three times more often in women than in men and it has been less studied in men. The results of gender influence on clinical course of the disease are contradictory. The aim of this study is to determine the difference in handgrip strength between female and male RA patients in comparison to healthy individuals. The study included 100 RA patients and 100 healthy individuals (50% were male in both groups). Handgrip strength was measured in both hands using a dynamometer. A two-way ANCOVA was used to analyse the data and age was included in the study as covariate. The results show that both male and female RA patients have lower handgrip strength compared to healthy individuals. The analysis of gender and disease interaction has shown that male RA patients have lower handgrip strength than female RA patients in comparison with the healthy group, age adjusted. This interaction is evident and statistically significant in both right hand (F 1, 195) = 14.62; p < 0.01) and left hand (F 1, 195) = 20.54; p < 0.01). The common-language effect size has shown that there is 92% (right hand) and 93% (left hand) chance that male individual will have stronger handgrip than his female counterpart. In RA patients, there is 77% chance for both hands that male will have stronger handgrip. Men and women with RA have significantly lower handgrip strength compared to healthy individuals and the difference is more pronounced in men which was not previously observed in the literature.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthAdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsDisease progressionHand strengthMuscle strength dynamometerMuscle weaknessRheumatoid arthritisSex characteristics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.