ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2021
Training status affects between-protocols differences in the assessment of maximal aerobic velocity.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exercise Intolerance in Young Physically Active Smokers Compared to Non-Smokers During Sinusoidal Cycling.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Top-class women's soccer performance: peak demands and distribution of the match activities relative to maximal intensities during official matches.Biology of sport · 2024Article
- Technical and locomotor demands in elite soccer: manipulating area per player during small-sided games to replicate official match demands.Biology of sport · 2023Article
- Comparison and Performance Validation of Calculated and Established Anaerobic Lactate Thresholds in Running.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeContinuous incremental protocols (CP) may misestimate the maximum aerobic velocity (V
methodsSixteen well-trained runners were classified according to higher (HI) or lower (LO) [Formula: see text]O
resultsV
conclusionsHigher aerobic training status witnessed by faster [Formula: see text]O
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.