ArticleJournal of anesthesia2021
A two-handed airway maneuver of mandibular advancement and mouth opening in the neutral neck position for immobilization of the cervical spine.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeImmobilization of the cervical spine after trauma is recommended as standard care to prevent secondary injury. We tested the hypothesis that a two-handed airway maneuver, consisting of mandibular advancement and mouth opening in the neutral neck position, would minimize changes in the angle of the cervical vertebrae at the C0/4 level and tidal volume in non-obese patients under anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade.
methodsTwenty consecutive patients without cervical spine injury undergoing general anesthesia were enrolled and evaluated. The primary variable was change in the angle of the cervical vertebrae at the C0/4 level during mask ventilation using the modified two-handed technique. Secondary variables included changes in the angles of the cervical vertebrae at each level between C0 and C4, anterior movement of the vertebral bodies, change in the angle between the head and neck, change in the pharyngeal airway space, and tidal volume during mask ventilation.
resultsThe two-handed airway maneuver of mandibular advancement and mouth opening resulted in statistically significant changes in the angle of the cervical spine at the C0/4 level (3.2 ± 3.0 degrees, P < 0.001) and the C3/4 level (1.4 ± 2.2 degrees, P = 0.01). The two-handed airway maneuver provided adequate mask ventilation without anterior movement of the vertebral bodies.
conclusionOur study suggests that a two-handed airway maneuver of mandibular advancement and mouth opening in the neutral neck position results in only slight change in the cervical vertebral angle at the C0/4 level in non-obese patients under general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.