Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34319252›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

Ethical Development of Digital Phenotyping Tools for Mental Health Applications: Delphi Study.

Nicole Martinez-Martin, Henry T Greely, Mildred K Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Towards Human-Centered Digital Health Interventions.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rethinking Ethics for an Era of Trusted Computational Tools.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole Martinez-Martin *Center for Biomedical Ethics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9345-0462
Henry T GreelyStanford Law School, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1105-6734
Mildred K ChoCenter for Biomedical Ethics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1669-3932

Funding

Ethical, Legal and Social Implications in the Use of Digital Technology for Mental Health ApplicationsK01MH118375 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MARTINEZ-MARTIN, NICOLE A · 2019 to 2022
$508k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH118375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital phenotyping (also known as personal sensing, intelligent sensing, or body computing) involves the collection of biometric and personal data in situ from digital devices, such as smartphones, wearables, or social media, to measure behavior or other health indicators. The collected data are analyzed to generate moment-by-moment quantification of a person's mental state and potentially predict future mental states. Digital phenotyping projects incorporate data from multiple sources, such as electronic health records, biometric scans, or genetic testing. As digital phenotyping tools can be used to study and predict behavior, they are of increasing interest for a range of consumer, government, and health care applications. In clinical care, digital phenotyping is expected to improve mental health diagnoses and treatment. At the same time, mental health applications of digital phenotyping present significant areas of ethical concern, particularly in terms of privacy and data protection, consent, bias, and accountability.

objectiveThis study aims to develop consensus statements regarding key areas of ethical guidance for mental health applications of digital phenotyping in the United States.

methodsWe used a modified Delphi technique to identify the emerging ethical challenges posed by digital phenotyping for mental health applications and to formulate guidance for addressing these challenges. Experts in digital phenotyping, data science, mental health, law, and ethics participated as panelists in the study. The panel arrived at consensus recommendations through an iterative process involving interviews and surveys. The panelists focused primarily on clinical applications for digital phenotyping for mental health but also included recommendations regarding transparency and data protection to address potential areas of misuse of digital phenotyping data outside of the health care domain.

resultsThe findings of this study showed strong agreement related to these ethical issues in the development of mental health applications of digital phenotyping: privacy, transparency, consent, accountability, and fairness. Consensus regarding the recommendation statements was strongest when the guidance was stated broadly enough to accommodate a range of potential applications. The privacy and data protection issues that the Delphi participants found particularly critical to address related to the perceived inadequacies of current regulations and frameworks for protecting sensitive personal information and the potential for sale and analysis of personal data outside of health systems.

conclusionsThe Delphi study found agreement on a number of ethical issues to prioritize in the development of digital phenotyping for mental health applications. The Delphi consensus statements identified general recommendations and principles regarding the ethical application of digital phenotyping to mental health. As digital phenotyping for mental health is implemented in clinical care, there remains a need for empirical research and consultation with relevant stakeholders to further understand and address relevant ethical issues.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPrivacyDelphi TechniqueElectronic Health RecordsHumansSmartphoneUnited Statesartificial intelligenceDelphi studydigital mental healthdigital phenotypingethicsmachine learningmental healthmobile phoneneuroethics

Identifiers

PMID34319252
PMCPMC8367187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.