Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34318732›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

玉峰 席

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

玉峰 席Department of Neonatology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8404-5008
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHuman umbilical endothelial cells (HUVECs) have been proved to be an effective whole-cell vaccine inhibiting tumor angiogenesis. In this study, we fused HUVECs with human lung adenocarcinoma cells A549 s, aiming at preparing lung cancer vaccine to achieve dual effects of anti-tumor angiogenesis and specific immunity to tumor cells.

methodsA549 cells were induced by ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) and 8-azaguanine (8-AG) to get hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HGPRT) auxotrophic A549 cells. Then Fused HGPRT auxotrophic A549 cells with primary HUVEC cells by combining electrofusion with polyethylene glycol (PEG). Afterward the fusion cells were screened by HAT and HT selective medium and sorted by flow cell sorter to obtain high-purity HUVEC-A549 cells. Finally, HUVEC-A549 cells were identified by karyotype analysis and western blotting.

resultsThe fusion efficiency of HUVEC-A549 cells prepared by combining electrofusion with polyethylene glycol (PEG) was significantly higher than that of electrofusion and PEG (43.0% vs 17.60% vs 2.71%,

conclusionsThese results indicate that HUVEC-A549 cells retain the biological characteristics of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and A549 cells. It can be used in the experimental study of lung cancer cell vaccine.

Indexed as

A549 CellsCancer VaccinesCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell FusionHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsImmunotherapyKaryotypeLung NeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicPolyethylene GlycolsCancer VaccinesPolyethylene GlycolsA549CD31electrofusionHUVECPEG

Identifiers

PMID34318732
PMCPMC8323407
OpenAlexW3190353041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.