Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34318620›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2021

Humoral response to neurofilaments and dipeptide repeats in ALS progression.

Fabiola Puentes, Vittoria Lombardi, Ching-Hua Lu, Ozlem Yildiz, Pietro Fratta, Adrian Isaacs, Yoana Bobeva, Joanne Wuu, ALS Biomarker Consortium, CReATe Consortium and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. The presence and clinical significance of autoantibodies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a narrative review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fabiola PuentesNeurodegeneration Group, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3697-4726
Vittoria LombardiNeurodegeneration Group, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom.
Ching-Hua LuDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Ozlem YildizNeurodegeneration Group, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom.
Pietro FrattaDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Adrian IsaacsDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Yoana BobevaNeurodegeneration Group, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom.
Joanne WuuDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
ALS Biomarker ConsortiumDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
CReATe ConsortiumDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Michael BenatarDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Andrea MalaspinaNeurodegeneration Group, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom.
Queen Mary University of London · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUniversity of Miami · USChina Medical University · TW

Funding

Uncovering new genes and disease modifiers for ALS and related disordersU54NS092091 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Corey T McMillan · 2014 to 2026
$19.8M
ALS Association US 17-CReATe-382CReATe Consortium U54NS092091EU2020 H2020 PHC-13-2014Medical Research Council MR/M008606/1Medical Research Council MR/S006508/1Motor Neuron Disease UKMotor Neurone Disease Association FRATTA/JAN15/946-795Motor Neurone Disease Association MALASPINA/APR13/817-791Motor Neurone Disease Association TURNER/OCT15/972-797MRC Industry Case Studentship MR/M015882/1NCATSNINDSNINDS NIH HHS U54 NS092091Office of Rare Diseases ResearchRare Diseases Clinical Research Network
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo appraise the utility as biomarkers of blood antibodies and immune complexes to neurofilaments and dipeptide repeat proteins, the products of translation of the most common genetic mutation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

methodsAntibodies and immune complexes against neurofilament light, medium, heavy chains as well as poly-(GP)-(GR) dipeptide repeats were measured in blood samples from the ALS Biomarkers (n = 107) and the phenotype-genotype biomarker (n = 129) studies and in 140 healthy controls. Target analyte levels were studied longitudinally in 37 ALS cases. Participants were stratified according to the rate of disease progression estimated before and after baseline and C9orf72 genetic status. Survival and longitudinal analyses were undertaken with reference to matched neurofilament protein expression.

resultsCompared to healthy controls, total neurofilament proteins and antibodies, neurofilament light immune complexes (p < 0.0001), and neurofilament heavy antibodies (p = 0.0061) were significantly elevated in ALS, patients with faster progressing disease (p < 0.0001) and in ALS cases with a C9orf72 mutation (p < 0.0003). Blood neurofilament light protein discriminated better ALS from healthy controls (AUC: 0.92; p < 0.0001) and faster from slower progressing ALS (AUC: 0.86; p < 0.0001) compared to heavy-chain antibodies and light-chain immune complexes (AUC: 0.79; p < 0.0001 and AUC: 0.74; p < 0.0001). Lower neurofilament heavy antibodies were associated with longer survival (Log-rank Chi-square: 7.39; p = 0.0065). Increasing levels of antibodies and immune complexes between time points were observed in faster progressing ALS.

conclusionsWe report a distinctive humoral response characterized by raising antibodies against neurofilaments and dipeptide repeats in faster progressing and C9orf72 genetic mutation carriers ALS patients. We confirm the significance of plasma neurofilament proteins in the clinical stratification of ALS.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisDipeptidesDisease ProgressionNeurofilament ProteinsAdultAgedBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersDipeptidesneurofilament protein Lneurofilament protein MNeurofilament Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34318620
PMCPMC8419401
OpenAlexW3186451647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.