Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34318573›Full record

ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Ethical issues in participatory arts methods for young people with adverse childhood experiences.

Gabriela Pavarini, Lindsay M Smith, Nicola Shaughnessy, Anna Mankee-Williams, Josita Kavitha Thirumalai, Natalie Russell, Kamaldeep Bhui

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Active Visual Art Therapy in the General Hospital: Facts and Challenges from an Ethical Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ethical issues in participatory arts methods for young people with adverse childhood experiences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriela PavariniDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5574-4021
Lindsay M SmithDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8035-9379
Nicola ShaughnessySchool of Arts, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9555-9987
Anna Mankee-WilliamsResearch and Innovation Department, Falmouth University, Falmouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0829-8441
Josita Kavitha ThirumalaiSt Anthony's Girls' Catholic Academy, Sunderland, UK.
Natalie RussellCornwall Council, Cornwall, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8300-9024
Kamaldeep BhuiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9205-2144
Cornwall Council · GBEast London NHS Foundation Trust · GBFalmouth University · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W002183/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextParticipatory arts-based methods such as photovoice, drama and music have increasingly been used to engage young people who are exposed to psychosocial risks. These methods have the potential to empower youth and provide them with an accessible and welcoming environment to express and manage difficult feelings and experiences. These effects are, however, dependent on the way these methods are implemented and how potential ethical concerns are handled.

objectiveUsing the current literature on arts-based health research as a foundation, this paper examines ethical issues emerging from participatory arts methods with young people with traumatic experiences.

resultsWe present a typology covering relevant issues such as power, accessibility, communication, trust and ownership, across the domains of partnership working, project entry, participation and dissemination. Drawing on our extensive clinical and research experiences, existing research and novel in-practice examples, we offer guidance for ethical dilemmas that might arise at different phases of research.

conclusionAdequate anticipation and consideration of ethical issues, together with the involvement of young people, will help ensure that arts methods are implemented in research and practice with young people in a fair, meaningful and empowering way. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The issues reviewed are largely based on the authors' experience conducting participatory research. Each of the projects referenced has its own systems for PPI including, variously, consultations with advisory groups, coproduction, youth ambassadors and mentor schemes. One of the coauthors, Josita Kavitha Thirumalai, is a young person trained in peer support and has provided extensive input across all stages.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesAdolescentCommunicationEmotionsHumansMoralsadverse childhood experiencesarts-based methodscoproductionethicsmental healthneurodivergenceparticipationparticipatory researchtraumayoung people

Identifiers

PMID34318573
PMCPMC8483199
OpenAlexW3165410162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.