Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34318468›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2021

Risk Factors for Intrapartum Cesarean Section Delivery in Low-risk Multiparous Women Following at Least a Prior Vaginal Birth (Robson Classification 3 and 4).

Gul Nihal Buyuk, Hatice Kansu-Celik, Zeynep Asli Oskovi Kaplan, Burcu Kisa, Sule Ozel, Yaprak Engin-Ustun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Caesarean section and respiratory system disorders in newborns.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gul Nihal BuyukDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Zekai Tahir Burak Woman's Health, Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4405-2876
Hatice Kansu-CelikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Zekai Tahir Burak Woman's Health, Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-7239
Zeynep Asli Oskovi KaplanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Zekai Tahir Burak Woman's Health, Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7554-4393
Burcu KisaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Zekai Tahir Burak Woman's Health, Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6728-0823
Sule OzelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Zekai Tahir Burak Woman's Health, Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4039-6495
Yaprak Engin-UstunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Zekai Tahir Burak Woman's Health, Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1011-3848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the risk factors for cesarean section (C-section) in low-risk multiparous women with a history of vaginal birth.

methodsThe present retrospective study included low-risk multiparous women with a history of vaginal birth who gave birth at between 37 and 42 gestational weeks. The subjects were divided into 2 groups according to the mode of delivery, as C-section Group and vaginal delivery Group. Risk factors for C-section such as demographic characteristics, ultrasonographic measurements, smoking, weight gain during pregnancy (WGDP), interval time between prior birth, history of macrosomic birth, and cervical dilatation at the admission to the hospital were obtained from the charts of the patients. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between groups.

resultsThe most common C-section indications were fetal distress and macrosomia (33.9% [

conclusionThis is the first study evaluating the risk factors for C-section in low-risk multiparous women with a history of vaginal birth according to the Robson classification 3 and 4. Fetal distress and suspected fetal macrosomia constituted most of the C-section indications.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionParityAdultCase-Control StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFetal DistressFetal MacrosomiaHumansLabor Stage, FirstMaternal AgePregnancyPremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSagittal Abdominal Diameter

Identifiers

PMID34318468
PMCPMC10411140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.