ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
The effect of distance on the adherence to postpartum follow-up in women with gestational diabetes.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and well-known long-term metabolic consequences, a low rate of postpartum screening in this population is reported. Few studies focused on environmental factors of attending and performing blood glucose screening tests in women with gestational diabetes. This work aimed to assess the proportion of uptake of postpartum follow-up after the first recall and to study the adherence-related factors in women with gestational diabetes. All women with gestational diabetes were recalled for postpartum screening in a tertiary care center as the center of the cohort study in 2016. The postal addresses were geocoded, and precise spatial (x, y) was provided for each mother's home location. SPSS and GIS were used for data analysis. The incidence rate of gestational diabetes was 8.5% (826/9630). Of women with gestational diabetes, 21.3% accepted to return and completed postpartum screening tests in the first recall. The distance from the cohort center, history of diabetes in the family, and a number of pregnancies were significant predictors for return to follow-up using binary logistic regression (P < 0.01). The first 25% of patients had a distance of 2346 m from the cohort center, and all of the mothers referred to the hospital were 0 to 5 km away, i.e., those who did not return were more than 5 km away (95% confidence interval). Overall screening uptake rate was low. Distance from the center of the screening was an essential factor in deciding to return and adhere to postpartum care in women with gestational diabetes. Geographic inequalities must be considered as a risk factor of visiting the healthcare center in addition to individual contributors. A more accessible center may improve the postpartum follow-up rate in women with a history of gestational diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.