ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2022
Diagnostic challenges in primary cardiac lymphoma, the opportunity of
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: Primary cardiac diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with sick sinus syndrome and literature review on disease management and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the value of
methodsClinical and imaging data of patients with PCLs and PCAs were collected. All patients underwent preoperative
resultsNine patients with PCL and eight patients with PCA were analyzed. There were significant differences in SUVmax (t = 3.790, P = .002), SUVmean (t = 4.273, P = .001), metabolic tumor volume (U = 13.00, P = .027), tumor-to-liver ratio (U = 10.00, P = .011), and total lesion glycolysis (U = 4.0, P = .001) between PCLs and PC
conclusionThe intensity- and volume-based PET parameters of PCL were significantly higher than those of PCA. The enhancement pattern and tumor morphology were also different. According to these characteristics, the two most common types of primary cardiac malignancies can be differentiated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.