Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34318356›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of hematology2021

Dawn of a new era of antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific T-cell engagers for treatment of multiple myeloma: a systematic review of literature.

Zoia Ehsan Khattak, Hamza Hashmi, Sana Irfan Khan, Sobia Aamir, Uroosa Arif, Atif Irfan Khan, Alicia Darwin, Arun D Singh, Jack Khouri, Faiz Anwer

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Zoia Ehsan KhattakKhyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Hamza HashmiMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Sana Irfan KhanAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Sobia AamirChildren Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Lahore, Pakistan.
Uroosa ArifKhyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Atif Irfan KhanAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Alicia DarwinUniversity of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
Arun D SinghCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jack KhouriCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Faiz AnwerTaussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. anwerf@ccf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6914-7439
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INCleveland Clinic · USKhyber Teaching Hospital · PKCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease with the majority of patients experiencing disease relapse despite response to initial therapy. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and bispecific T-cell engagers are innovative immunotherapeutic approaches currently in development for the treatment of MM. This systematic review summarizes the efficacy and safety of ADCs and bispecific T-cell engagers in relapsed refractory (RR) MM patients from 2010 to date. Comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Wiley Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov . A total of 13 studies (n = 529) met inclusion eligibility. All studies were prospective in nature investigating ADCs or bispecific T-cell engagers in RR MM; 10 trials were phase 1 and 3 were phase 2. The median age of patients ranged from 24 to 82 years. Among trials with ADC regimens, the overall response (OR) ranged from 34 to 60% and complete response (CR) ranged from 3 to 6%. The most common non-hematologic adverse event (AE) of ADCs was keratopathy, while anemia and thrombocytopenia were the most common hematological AEs. With bispecific T-cell engagers , ORR ranged from 31 to 83%, CR ranged from 7 to 22%, and partial response (PR) ranged from 5 to 16%. The most common non-hematologic AE of bispecific T-cell engagers was cytokine release syndrome (CRS) while the most common hematological AE was neutropenia. Initial data appears to show good clinical activity and tolerable safety profiles, making ADCs and bispecific T-cell engagers promising agents for RRMM. Future studies with newer combinations and a longer follow-up are needed to determine the precise role of these novel therapies in the evolving paradigm of MM treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalHumansImmunoconjugatesMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalT-LymphocytesAntibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmunoconjugatesAntibody-drug conjugateBispecific antibodiesBispecific T-cell engagerImmunotherapyMultiple myelomaRelapsed refractory

Identifiers

PMID34318356
OpenAlexW3185619265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.