Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34318130›Full record

ArticleJTCVS techniques2021

Arch replacement with collared elephant trunks: The Siena approach.

Eugenio Neri, Luigi Muzzi, Enrico Tucci, Marco Cini, Lucio Barabesi, Giulio Tommasino, Carmelo Ricci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS techniques, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The development of the Siena graft.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Hybrid Endovascular and Open Interventions for Aortic Disease.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eugenio NeriAortic Surgery Unit, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
Luigi MuzziAortic Surgery Unit, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
Enrico TucciAortic Surgery Unit, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
Marco CiniInterventional Radiology Unit, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
Lucio BarabesiDepartment of Statistics, Università degli Studi di Siena, Siena, Italy.
Giulio TommasinoAortic Surgery Unit, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
Carmelo RicciInterventional Radiology Unit, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
University of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo illustrate our experience and results in patients with diffuse aneurysmal disease treated with arch replacement using the Siena collared graft, a device designed in 2002 to improve the elephant trunk technique. Results of the first step surgical implant and the subsequent treatment strategies, with extensive use of endovascular techniques, are reported.

methodsAll aortic arch-replacement procedures using the Siena graft between February 2002 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for early and late clinical outcomes.

resultsOf 146 patients (54 women, 36.9%) with a median age of 69.1 years (interquartile range 58.4-75.0 years), 55 (37.6%) had acute/chronic dissection with false lumen aneurysmal dilatation, 91 (62.3%) had degenerative aneurysms, 45 (30.8%) were redo operations, and 14 (9.5%) had connective tissue disease. First-stage outcomes: 10.9% 30-day mortality (n = 16); 5.4% stroke (n = 8, 6 disabling, 2 nondisabling; 3 fatal); and 0.6% paraplegia. Outcomes for 113 second-stage procedures (77.3%, n = 97 endovascular [66.4%], n = 16 surgical [10.9%]) were 5.3% and 8.8% 30-day and 180-day mortality; no stroke; 10.6% paraplegia. Median follow-up was 5.7 years (range: 0-18.02 years) median survival was 16.65 years (95% lower confidence limit, 10.06 years) with no significant difference between aneurysm and dissection patients. Freedom from further treatment was 87.0% (95% confidence interval, 79.9%-94.7%) at 5 years and 71.4% (95% confidence interval, 71.4%-84.7%) at 10 years; median time to reintervention was 2.59 years (interquartile range, 0.52-5.20 years) with no difference (

conclusionsSiena collared graft represents a reliable platform for the treatment of diffuse aneurysmal disease. This device offers the flexibility required in the treatment of extended aortic lesions and guarantees the choice of the most appropriate approach for treatment completion. In this context, the availability of hybrid grafts has not modified the role of this device in arch surgery.

Indexed as

aortaaortic arch surgeryCI, confidence intervalCSF, cerebrospinal spinal fluidCT, computed tomographyelephant trunk techniqueET, elephant trunkIQR, interquartile rangeLCL, lower confidence limitOR, odds ratioOSR, open surgical repairPAU, penetrating aortic ulcerSINE, stent graft–induced new entry tearTEVAR, thoracic endovascular aortic repairthoracic endovascular repair

Identifiers

PMID34318130
PMCPMC8300570
OpenAlexW3108272435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.