Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34316712›Full record

ArticleNAR cancer2021

Analysis of gene expression and mutation data points on contribution of transcription to the mutagenesis by APOBEC enzymes.

Almira Chervova, Bulat Fatykhov, Alexander Koblov, Evgeny Shvarov, Julia Preobrazhenskaya, Dmitry Vinogradov, Gennady V Ponomarev, Mikhail S Gelfand, Marat D Kazanov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Almira ChervovaInstitute of Oncology, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, 117997, Russia.
Bulat FatykhovDepartment of Control and Applied Mathematics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, 141700, Russia.
Alexander KoblovInterSystems Corporation, Cambridge MA, 02142, USA.
Evgeny ShvarovInterSystems Corporation, Cambridge MA, 02142, USA.
Julia PreobrazhenskayaFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119234, Russia.
Dmitry VinogradovResearch and Training Center of Bioinformatics, Institute for Information Transmission Problems (the Kharkevich Institute, RAS), Moscow, 127051, Russia.
Gennady V PonomarevResearch and Training Center of Bioinformatics, Institute for Information Transmission Problems (the Kharkevich Institute, RAS), Moscow, 127051, Russia.
Mikhail S GelfandResearch and Training Center of Bioinformatics, Institute for Information Transmission Problems (the Kharkevich Institute, RAS), Moscow, 127051, Russia.
Marat D KazanovResearch and Training Center of Bioinformatics, Institute for Information Transmission Problems (the Kharkevich Institute, RAS), Moscow, 127051, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2314-5507
Institute for Information Transmission Problems · RUInterSystems (United States) · USSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology · RUInstitut Pasteur · FRLomonosov Moscow State University · RUMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of the role of the APOBEC enzymes in human cancers, the mechanisms of this type of mutagenesis remain little understood. Theoretically, targeting of single-stranded DNA by the APOBEC enzymes could occur during cellular processes leading to the unwinding of DNA double-stranded structure. Some evidence points to the importance of replication in the APOBEC mutagenesis, while the role of transcription is still underexplored. Here, we analyzed gene expression and whole genome sequencing data from five types of human cancers with substantial APOBEC activity to estimate the involvement of transcription in the APOBEC mutagenesis and compare its impact with that of replication. Using the TCN motif as the mutation signature of the APOBEC enzymes, we observed a correlation of active APOBEC mutagenesis with gene expression, confirmed the increase of APOBEC-induced mutations in early-replicating regions and estimated the relative impact of transcription and replication on the APOBEC mutagenesis. We also found that the known effect of higher density of APOBEC-induced mutations on the lagging strand was highest in middle-replicating regions and observed higher APOBEC mutation density on the sense strand, the latter bias positively correlated with the gene expression level.

Identifiers

PMID34316712
PMCPMC8253550
OpenAlexW3182977181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.