Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34316681›Full record

ArticleNAR cancer2020

Putatively cancer-specific exon-exon junctions are shared across patients and present in developmental and other non-cancer cells.

Julianne K David, Sean K Maden, Benjamin R Weeder, Reid F Thompson, Abhinav Nellore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neoantigens: promising targets for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Implications of Antigen Selection on T Cell-Based Immunotherapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julianne K DavidComputational Biology Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2690-8239
Sean K MadenComputational Biology Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Benjamin R WeederComputational Biology Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Reid F ThompsonComputational Biology Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3661-5296
Abhinav NelloreComputational Biology Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

CSRD VA IK2 CX002049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study probes the distribution of putatively cancer-specific junctions across a broad set of publicly available non-cancer human RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) datasets. We compared cancer and non-cancer RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project and the Sequence Read Archive. We found that (i) averaging across cancer types, 80.6% of exon-exon junctions thought to be cancer-specific based on comparison with tissue-matched samples (

Identifiers

PMID34316681
PMCPMC8209686
OpenAlexW3004131970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.