Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34316561›Full record

ArticleInfection prevention in practice2020

Status of Infection Prevention and Control in Tanzanian Primary Health Care Facilities: Learning From Star Rating Assessment.

Erick Kinyenje, Joseph Hokororo, Eliudi Eliakimu, Talhiya Yahya, Bernard Mbwele, Mohamed Mohamed, Gideon Kwesigabo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erick KinyenjeSchool of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O Box 65001, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Joseph HokororoHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children-MoHCDGEC, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Eliudi EliakimuHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children-MoHCDGEC, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Talhiya YahyaHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children-MoHCDGEC, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Bernard MbweleDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Dar es Salaam - Mbeya College of Health and Allied Sciences (UDSM-MCHAS), P.O Box 608, Mbeya, Tanzania.
Mohamed MohamedTanzania Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme (TFELTP), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Gideon KwesigaboSchool of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O Box 65001, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe WHO estimates 10-30% of hospital admissions are associated with poor infection prevention and control (IPC). There are no reliable data on IPC status in Tanzanian healthcare facilities; hence the Star Rating Assessment (SRA) was established to address this. This study compared the health facility performances on adherence to IPC principles using baseline and reassessment data of SRA.

methodsA retrospective analysis of data from eight randomly selected regions across Tanzania. Data was gathered from an SRA database in which records of baseline assessments (2015/16) and reassessments (2017/18) were documented. Each healthcare facility's ownership and service level were investigated as independent variables.

resultsA total of 2,131 healthcare facilities at baseline and 2,185 at reassessment were analysed. Median adherence to IPC principles increased from 31% (IQR: 20%, 46%) to 57% (IQR: 41.4%, 73.2%) after interventions (p<0.001).Privately-owned facilities had higher adherence to IPC principles compared to publicly-owned facilities during baseline (p<0.001) however, the difference was not significant after intervention (p=0.751). On average, hospitals scored highest followed by health centres and then dispensaries during both assessments.Being a privately-owned facility was a predictor of attaining a recommended IPC score of 80% at baseline (POR=1.92 CI=1.06-3.48) but not after the intervention. Facility level was not a predictor during baseline assessment; however after intervention hospitals were twice as likely to attain the recommended score compared to dispensaries (POR=2.27 CI=1.15-4.45).

conclusionAssessment and rating of quality and organization of health services plus management support to healthcare facilities, leads to improved adherence to IPC principles.

Indexed as

Infection prevention and controlPrimary healthcare facilitiesQuality improvementStar Rating Assessment

Identifiers

PMID34316561
PMCPMC7311348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.