Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34316543›Full record

ArticleAnnual review of control, robotics, and autonomous systems2018

Autonomy in Rehabilitation Robotics: An Intersection.

Brenna D Argall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual review of control, robotics, and autonomous systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Brenna D ArgallMcCormick School of Engineering and Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA, 60208.

Funding

SCH: A Formalism for customizing and Training Intelligent Assistive DevicesR01EB019335 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI ARGALL, BRENNA, SRINIVASA, SIDDHARTHA · 2014 to 2016
$543k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the field of human rehabilitation, robotic machines are used both to rehabilitate the body and to perform functional tasks. Robotics autonomy able to perceive the external world and reason about high-level control decisions, however, seldom is present in these machines. For functional tasks in particular, autonomy could help to decrease the operational burden on the human and perhaps even to increase access-and this potential only grows as human motor impairments become more severe. There are however serious, and often subtle, considerations to introducing clinically-feasible robotics autonomy to rehabilitation robots and machines. Today the fields of robotics autonomy and rehabilitation robotics are largely separate. The topic of this article is at the intersection of these fields: the introduction of clinically-feasible autonomy solutions to rehabilitation robots, and opportunities for autonomy within the rehabilitation domain.

Indexed as

control interfaceshuman rehabilitationhuman-robot interactionrehabilitation roboticsrobotics autonomy

Identifiers

PMID34316543
PMCPMC8313033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.