Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34316418›Full record

ArticleThe mental health clinician2021

Evaluation of drug-drug interactions in hospitalized patients on medications for OUD.

Olivia Berger, Katherine Rector, Jacqueline Meredith, Jamielynn Sebaaly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The mental health clinician, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia BergerPain Management and Palliative Care PGY-2 Pharmacy Resident, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2123-3124
Katherine RectorClinical Team Leader, Internal Medicine, Atrium Health's Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4683-7802
Jacqueline MeredithClinical Pharmacy Specialist, Infectious Diseases, Clinical Team Leader, Antimicrobial Stewardship (Central Division), Atrium Health's Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1066-6549
Jamielynn SebaalyPain Management and Palliative Care PGY-2 Pharmacy Resident, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8882-6514
Carolinas Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedications used to treat OUD have common metabolic pathways and pharmacodynamic properties that can lead to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that may go unnoticed in the inpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to identify the frequency of DDIs between medications prescribed for OUD and commonly used inpatient medications.

methodsThis was a retrospective review of orders for buprenorphine, buprenorphine-naloxone, and methadone to identify potential DDIs. Adult inpatients with an order for one of these medications for OUD were included. Medication regimens were evaluated throughout the inpatient stay and on day of discharge for DDIs. DDIs were classified by severity and type of interaction (increased risk of QT prolongation, additive CNS effects/respiratory depression, and opioid withdrawal). The primary endpoint was the number of potential DDIs. Other endpoints included number of each classification/severity of DDI, duration of therapy of interacting medications, and modifications made to OUD medications because of DDIs.

resultsA total of 102 patients were included, with 215 inpatient interactions and 83 interactions at discharge identified. While inpatient, 85% of patients were on an interacting medication, and 46% of patients were on an interacting medication at discharge. The most common classification of DDI was additive CNS effects/respiratory depression (68.8% inpatient, 50.6% discharge), followed by QT prolongation (24.2% inpatient, 45.8% discharge). The majority of DDIs were classified as requiring close monitoring rather than contraindicated. DISCUSSION: There are opportunities to optimize the prescribing practices surrounding OUD medications in both the inpatient setting and at discharge to ensure patient safety.

Indexed as

buprenorphinedrug-drug interactionsmethadoneopioid use disorderOUD

Identifiers

PMID34316418
PMCPMC8287868
OpenAlexW3183667392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.