Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34316367›Full record

ArticleMultidisciplinary respiratory medicine2021

Accuracy and precision of pulse oximeter at different sensor locations in patients with heart failure.

Alaa Thabet Hassan, Soher Mostafa Ahmed, Azza Salah AbdelHaffeez, Sherif A A Mohamed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap.Physiological measurement · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. A study on the rapid diagnosis of chronic heart failure by measuring the difference in pulse oxygen saturation before and after arm compression.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alaa Thabet HassanDepartment of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis.
Soher Mostafa AhmedDepartment of Internal Medicine.
Azza Salah AbdelHaffeezDepartment of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Sherif A A MohamedDepartment of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis.
Assiut University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite its wide use in clinical practice, few studies have assessed the role of pulse oximetry in patients with heart failure. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the pulse oximeter in patients with heart failure and to determine this accuracy at three different sensor locations.

methodsComparison of pulse oximetry reading (SpO

resultsA total of 235 patients and 90 control subjects were enrolled. There were significant differences in O

conclusionPulse oximetry is a reliable tool in assessing oxygen saturation in patients with heart failure of different severity. In HF with EF>40% and in AHF with O

Indexed as

accuracyevaluationheart failurelocationmyocardial infarctionPulse oximetersensor

Identifiers

PMID34316367
PMCPMC8278778
OpenAlexW3182271296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.