Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34316252›Full record

ArticleSarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG2021

Clinical phenotyping in sarcoidosis management.

Giuseppe Domenico Rana, Miriana d'Alessandro, Luigi Rizzi, Laura Bergantini, Paolo Cameli, Alfredo Vozza, Piersante Sestini, Patrizia Suppressa, Elena Bargagli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A single-center rheumatology experience of sarcoidosis: observations from 70 patients.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2023
    Article
  3. Systematic review of the diagnostic role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in sarcoidosis.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giuseppe Domenico RanaInternal Medicine Unit "C. Frugoni", Centre for rare diseases, University Hospital Bari, Bari, Italy.
Miriana d'AlessandroRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Luigi RizziInternal Medicine Unit "C. Frugoni", Centre for rare diseases, University Hospital Bari, Bari, Italy.
Laura BergantiniRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Paolo CameliRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Alfredo VozzaInternal Medicine Unit "C. Frugoni", Centre for rare diseases, University Hospital Bari, Bari, Italy.
Piersante SestiniRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Patrizia SuppressaInternal Medicine Unit "C. Frugoni", Centre for rare diseases, University Hospital Bari, Bari, Italy.
Elena BargagliRespiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcoidosis is a heterogeneous granulomatous disease. Biological markers and clinical features could allow specific phenotypes to be associated with different prognosis, severity and treatment responses. This retrospective multicentre study aims to analyse the clinical and immunological features of sarcoidosis and to identify a routine non-invasive biomarker useful in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND

methods129 Caucasian patients with sarcoidosis (median age IQR, 56 (47-62)) were enrolled retrospectively in the study. Medical history, routine laboratory findings, lung function results and radiological features from the last examination of October 2019 - February 2020 were gathered from the patients' clinical records.

resultsRegardless their clinical status at disease onset, at the last clinical examination we didn't observe any differences in terms of therapeutic management between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Stratifying sarcoidosis population according to therapeutic management, the N/L ratio was higher in the treated group than in the non-treated group (p=0.0034). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis distinguished these two groups according to N/L ratio with an area under the curve (AUC) of 65.3% and a best cut-off value of 2.21. Peripheral N/L ratio was significantly higher in radiological stages 2-4 than in stages 0-1 (p=0.0090) distinguishing these two groups with an AUC of 64% and a best cut-off value of 2.13. DISCUSSION: In our multicentric cohort study similar periodic follow-up can be suggested for symptomatic and asymptomatic sarcoidosis patients at onset. In the heterogeneous context of this disease, N/L ratio proved to be a useful and simple routine laboratory biomarker related to disease activity and need for treatment.

Indexed as

biomarkersphenotypingsarcoidosis

Identifiers

PMID34316252
PMCPMC8288209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.