Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34316218›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2021

Trials for preparation and evaluation of a combined inactivated reassorted H5N1 and

Marwa Fathy El Sayed, Reem A Soliman, Heba Mohamed Ghanem, Marwa M S Khedr, Gina M Mohamed, Mounir Mohamed Diab El Safty

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Avian PathogenicVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marwa Fathy El SayedCentral Laboratory for Evaluation of Veterinary Biologics, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Reem A SolimanCentral Laboratory for Evaluation of Veterinary Biologics, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Heba Mohamed GhanemCentral Laboratory for Evaluation of Veterinary Biologics, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Marwa M S KhedrCentral Laboratory for Evaluation of Veterinary Biologics, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Gina M MohamedCentral Laboratory for Evaluation of Veterinary Biologics, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Mounir Mohamed Diab El SaftyCentral Laboratory for Evaluation of Veterinary Biologics, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Agricultural Research Center · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimAvian influenza (AI), which is one of the major respiratory diseases of poultry, and MATERIALS AND

methodsWe divided one hundred 3-week-old chicks into four groups: Group 1 was vaccinated with prepared inactivated AI H5N1formulated with Montanide ISA70, Group 2 was vaccinated with inactivated

resultsWe found the three vaccines to be safe and sterile during all periods of examination and observation. The HI test showed that Group 1 exhibited specific antibody titers of 2.3 log

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that producing a combined vaccine using

Indexed as

avian influenza (H5N1)enzyme-linked immunosorbent assayEscherichia coli O157hemagglutination inhibition testMontanide ISA70

Identifiers

PMID34316218
PMCPMC8304417
OpenAlexW3175615555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.