Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34316211›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2021

Assessment of quality and safety of meats from various animal species in the Shuchinsk-Burabay resort zone, Kazakhstan.

B S Maikanov, G T Ismagulova, L T Auteleyeva, Zh O Kemeshov, D K Zhanabayeva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Equine Sarcocystosis in the Northern Region of the Republic of Kazakhstan.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B S MaikanovDepartment of Veterinary Sanitation, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences & Animal Husbandry, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan.
G T IsmagulovaDepartment of Veterinary Sanitation, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences & Animal Husbandry, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan.
L T AuteleyevaDepartment of Veterinary Sanitation, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences & Animal Husbandry, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Zh O KemeshovDepartment of Veterinary Sanitation, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences & Animal Husbandry, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan.
D K ZhanabayevaDepartment of Veterinary Sanitation, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences & Animal Husbandry, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to determine the food safety and protein adequacy of meats from various animals in the Shuchinsk-Burabay resort zone. MATERIALS AND

methodsSamples of meat were collected from markets "Zhomart" and "Kausar." Two hundred and ninety-eight samples of meat were obtained: beef - 166, horse - 42, pork - 67, mutton - 8, and poultry - 15. From each carcass, part of the carcass, point samples were taken to form an average sample and conduct research. Analyses used inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography. The determination of amino acid composition was carried out following the chromatographic method for determining the amino acid composition of meat proteins.

resultsThe quality of meats from the resort zone was lower than recommended due to the reduced content of essential amino acids, including valine, lysine, isoleucine, and phenylalanine. Concentrations of heavy metals and radionuclides did not exceed maximum permissible limits, and trace concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and lead were detected in all meat samples, except beef. The latter meat showed increased concentrations of mercury.

conclusionIn terms of quality indicators, all types of meat met standards; however, pork protein displayed the most favorable amino acid composition, both for content of essential amino acids and the ratio of amounts of essential to non-essential amino acids. For content of heavy metals, poultry and pork meats were safest.

Indexed as

amino acid ratefood safetyheavy metal saltsShuchinsk-Burabay Resort Zone

Identifiers

PMID34316211
PMCPMC8304409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.