Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34316126›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of radiology & imaging2021

Demystifying Sacral Masses: A Pictorial Review.

Julie Senne, Van Nguyen, Derek Staner, James D Stensby, Ambarish P Bhat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of radiology & imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. New options and techniques in reconstructing the sacrum.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Beyond Chordoma: A Comprehensive Review of Sacral Lesions.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie SenneDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States.
Van NguyenDepartment of Pathology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States.
Derek StanerDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States.
James D StensbyDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States.
Ambarish P BhatDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sacrum is a triangular shaped bone made up of five fused vertebral bodies. It is composed of bone, cartilage, marrow elements as well as notochord remnants and is a common site for both benign and malignant (primary and secondary) tumors. Familiarity with the imaging features and clinical presentations of sacral bone tumors could be helpful in narrowing the differential diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography are the preferred imaging modalities for evaluating sacral masses. This pictorial review will highlight imaging features of common sacral tumors with pathologic correlation. Additionally, this article will review some critical principles and helpful tips to successfully biopsy these lesions.

Indexed as

chondrosarcomachordomagiant cell tumormetastasisosteosarcomasacrum

Identifiers

PMID34316126
PMCPMC8299490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.