ArticleCellulose (London, England)2021
Comparative hydrolysis analysis of cellulose samples and aspects of its application in conservation science.
Article in Cellulose (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated one-pot ultrasound-assisted method for carotenoid extraction from Rhodosporidium toruloides.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Lignin Fractionation and Functionalization under Mild Conditions via Reactive Extraction.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Strong Association between Proanthocyanidins and Polysaccharides in the Cell Walls of Western Redcedar Bark.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
- Sustainable Films Derived fromPolymers · 2025Article
- A Network of Processes for Biorefining Burdock Seeds and Roots.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge about the carbohydrate composition of pulp and paper samples is essential for their characterization, further processing, and understanding the properties. In this study, we compare sulfuric acid hydrolysis and acidic methanolysis, followed by GC-MS analysis of the corresponding products, by means of 42 cellulose and polysaccharide samples. Results are discussed and compared to solid-state NMR (crystallinity) and gel permeation chromatography (weight-averaged molecular mass) data. The use of the hydrolysis methods in the context of cellulose conservation science is evaluated, using e-beam treated and artificially aged cellulose samples. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10570-021-04048-6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.