Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34315797›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

COVID-19-related knowledge, attitudes and practices: a mixed-mode cross-sectional survey in Liberia.

Josiah Brown Wilson, Andreas Deckert, Rupal Shah, Nicholas Kyei, Lauretta Copeland Dahn, Rosalita Doe-Rogers, Augustine Bowuo Hinneh, Lydia Wortee Johnson, Gudgy Dweh Natt, Joseph Augustus Verdier and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Migration Intent of Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Kosovo.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Josiah Brown WilsonPublic Health, William VS Tubman University, Harper, Liberia.
Andreas DeckertInstitute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rupal ShahInstitute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nicholas KyeiInstitute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lauretta Copeland DahnNursing, William VS Tubman University, Harper, Liberia.
Rosalita Doe-RogersNursing, William VS Tubman University, Harper, Liberia.
Augustine Bowuo HinnehPublic Health, William VS Tubman University, Harper, Liberia.
Lydia Wortee JohnsonNursing, William VS Tubman University, Harper, Liberia.
Gudgy Dweh NattPublic Health, William VS Tubman University, Harper, Liberia.
Joseph Augustus VerdierPublic Health, William VS Tubman University, Harper, Liberia.
Adele VosperHealth Focus, Potsdam, Germany.
Valérie R LouisInstitute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter DambachInstitute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany peter.dambach@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-6866
Iona Thomas-ConnorNursing, William VS Tubman University, Harper, Liberia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of COVID-19 of rural and urban residents in Liberia to inform the development of local social and behaviour change communication strategies.

designCross-sectional, mixed-mode (online and telephone) survey using non-probability sampling.

settingAll 15 counties in Liberia with a focus on Maryland County.

participantsFrom 28 May to 28 June 2020, data were collected from a total of 431 adults aged 18 years and older (telephone 288 (66.8%); online 143 (33.2%)) out of a total of 741 contacts.

main outcome measuresKAP scores. Frequencies and proportions were calculated, followed by univariate and multivariable analyses to examine the association between KAP scores and the sociodemographic variables.

resultsAround 69% of the online survey respondents were younger than 35 years of age, compared with 56% in the telephone interviews. The majority (87%) of online respondents had completed tertiary education, compared with 77% of the telephone respondents. Male participants, on average, achieved higher knowledge (52%) and attitude scores (72%), in contrast to females (49% and 67%, respectively). Radio (71%) was the most cited source for COVID-19 information, followed by social media (63%). After controlling for sociodemographic variables, adaptive regression modelling revealed that survey mode achieved 100% importance for predicting knowledge and practice levels with regard to COVID-19.

conclusionsThe survey population demonstrated moderate COVID-19 knowledge, with significant differences between survey mode and educational level. Correct knowledge of COVID-19 was associated with appropriate practices in Maryland County. Generalisation of survey findings must be drawn carefully owing to the limitations of the sampling methods. Yet, given the differences in knowledge gaps between survey modes, sex, education, occupation and place of residence, it is recommended that information is tailored to different audiences.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLiberiaMaleMarylandSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19health & safetypublic health

Identifiers

PMID34315797
PMCPMC8318717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.