Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34315650›Full record

ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2024

Quantifying Vocal Repertoire Tessituras Through Real-Time Measures.

Matthew Schloneger, Eric J Hunter, Lynn Maxfield

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew SchlonegerDivision of Fine Arts, Friends University, 2100 W. University Avenue, Wichita, Kansas 67213. Electronic address: matthew_schloneger@friends.edu.
Eric J HunterDept of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, 404 Wilson Rd, Room 291, Communication Arts and Sciences Building, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Lynn MaxfieldUtah Center for Vocology, University of Utah, 240 S. 1500 E., Room 206, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Friends University · USMichigan State University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Protecting Teachers’ Voices: Investigating Risk Factors, Conducting Cost AnalysisR01DC012315 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HUNTER, ERIC J · 2013 to 2025
$5.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVoice teachers use anecdotal evidence and experience in determining the appropriateness of repertoire for each student's development. Tessitura is important in that determination, but until recently a straightforward, repeatable, and quantifiable method for determining tessitura has not existed. However, technology exists to provide the means to estimate the tessituras of standard vocal repertoire by measuring sung pitch (fundamental frequency) and vocal dose (amount of phonation) in real-time performance. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the combined use of tessituragrams, Voice Range Profiles (VRPs), a singer's self-perception of a performance, and expert listeners perception of a performance towards the goal of a more systematic way of selecting appropriate voice repertoire for singers. The following research questions guided this investigation: 1) How do Performance Range Profiles (PRPs, performance-based tessituragrams computed from neck skin surface vibration during singing), compare to score-based tessituragrams of the same selection in the same key? 2) How do PRPs of the same vocal score compare when performed in three different keys? 3) How do singer VRPs compare with PRPs of three performances of a score, each sung in a different key? and 4) How do singer and expert panel perceptions of the selection's "fit" in three different keys compare with the alignment of each singer's VRP to their PRPs? Four female singers and five expert voice pedagogues were enlisted to address these questions.

resultsThe distribution (histogram) of the score-based tessituragram closely matched the distribution of performance-based tessituragrams (PRP), suggesting that score-based tessituragrams have promise in accurately reflecting the performance-based tessitura of a musical vocal work. Acquired data revealed relationships of practical importance between score-derived tessituragrams, PRPs, acquired VRPs, and singer perceptions of ease in singing. These data suggest that score-based tessituragrams aligned with singer VRPs show promise in repertoire selection. However, there was only a minor relationship between expert panel perceptions of ease in singing and the acquired PRPs or singer perceptions of ease. Creation of a score-based tessituragram database could be combined with singer VRPs to assist in appropriate repertoire selection.

Indexed as

SingingVoiceFemaleHumansPhonationSelf ConceptVoice QualityTessitura—Tessituragram—Voice Range Profile—Vocal dose—Voice dosimetry

Identifiers

PMID34315650
PMCPMC8786980
OpenAlexW3185477460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.