Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34315448›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2021

Is occupational physical activity associated with mortality in UK Biobank?

Matthew Pearce, Tessa Strain, Katrien Wijndaele, Stephen J Sharp, Alexander Mok, Søren Brage

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew PearceMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Level 3 Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SL, UK.
Tessa StrainMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Level 3 Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SL, UK.
Katrien WijndaeleMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Level 3 Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SL, UK.
Stephen J SharpMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Level 3 Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SL, UK.
Alexander MokMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Level 3 Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SL, UK.
Søren BrageMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Level 3 Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SL, UK. soren.brage@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1265-7355
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Department of Health IS_BRC-1215-20014Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/4, MC_UU_12015/3, and MC_UU_12015/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent physical activity guidelines do not distinguish between activity accumulated in different behavioural domains but some studies suggest that occupational physical activity (OPA) may not confer health benefits and could even be detrimental. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between OPA and mortality outcomes.

methodsFrom baseline (2006-2010), 460,901 UK Biobank participants (aged 40-69 years) were followed for a median 12.0 (IQR: 11.3-12.7) years. OPA was categorised by cross-tabulating degree of manual work and walking/standing work amongst those in paid employment (n = 267,765), and combined with categories of occupational status for those not in paid employment (n = 193,136). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate sex-stratified hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for mortality from all causes, CVD, and cancer by occupational group, and for working hours/week and non-occupational physical activity stratified by occupational group. Models included adjustment for age and a range of lifestyle, socio-economic and health-related covariates.

resultsDuring 5,449,989 person-years of follow-up, 28,740 deaths occurred. Compared to those reporting no heavy manual or walking/standing work (e.g. sedentary office workers) and adjusting for covariates, retirement was associated with lower mortality in women (HR = 0.62, CI: 0.53-0.72) and men (HR = 0.80, CI: 0.71-0.90), whereas unemployment was associated with higher mortality in men only (HR = 1.24, CI: 1.07-1.45). Within the working population, there was no evidence of differences in all-cause, CVD or cancer mortality by OPA group when comparing those reporting higher levels of OPA to the lowest OPA reference group for both women and men. Working < 35 h/week versus 35-40 h/week was associated with lower mortality in women (HR = 0.85, CI: 0.79-0.92) and men (HR = 0.83, CI: 0.78-0.89), with no interaction by OPA. Non-occupational physical activity was associated with lower mortality in working women (HR = 0.89 per 5 kJ/day/kg, CI: 0.84-0.95) and men (HR = 0.87 per 5 kJ/day/kg, CI: 0.84-0.91), with no interaction by OPA group.

conclusionsJobs classified as higher levels of OPA may not be as active as reported, or the types of physical activity performed in those jobs are not health-enhancing. Irrespective of OPA category or employment status, non-occupational physical activity appears to provide health benefits.

Indexed as

ExerciseMortalityWalkingAdultAgedCause of DeathEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureOccupationsRisk FactorsUnited KingdomHeavyLabourLeisure-timeParadox

Identifiers

PMID34315448
PMCPMC8314512
OpenAlexW3186351637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.