Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34315436›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Multilevel mixed effects analysis of individual and community level factors associated with modern contraceptive use among married women in Uganda.

Ronald Wasswa, Allen Kabagenyi, Paulino Ariho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Modern Contraceptive Use Among Young Women in Kampala Slums: Research Findings from the TOPOWA Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ronald WasswaDepartment of Statistical Methods and Actuarial Science, School of Statistics & Planning, College of Business and Management Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda. rwasswa93@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1251-2460
Allen KabagenyiDepartment of Population Studies, School of Statistics & Planning, College of Business and Management Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Paulino ArihoDepartment of Sociology and Social Administration, Kyambogo University, P.O. Box 1, Kampala, Uganda.
Makerere University · UGKyambogo University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn spite of the universal right for women to decide freely for themselves when, and how many children they want to have in life, married women in Uganda are less likely to use modern contraceptives as compared to other marital categories. This study examines the individual and community factors associated with modern contraceptive use among married women in Uganda.

methodsThe study used data from the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey which comprised of 8671 married women aged 15-49 years who were fecund and non-pregnant at the time of the survey. Analysis was done using a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model.

resultsFindings showed that married women who were; Muslims (AOR = 0.78, CI = 0.66-0.91), had more than five children (AOR = 0.76, CI = 0.61-0.98), staying in communities with high poverty (AOR = 0.78, CI = 0.65-0.93), with older age at first birth (AOR = 0.94, CI = 0.92-0.96) as well as having spousal age difference of more than 9 years (AOR = 0.86, CI = 0.76-0.98) were associated with low modern contraceptive use. Women living in communities with higher age at first marriage (AOR = 0.93, CI = 0.88-0.98) or higher sexual debut (AOR = 0.91, CI = 0.85-0.98) were also associated with reduced odds of modern contraception. In addition, older women (AOR = 1.03, CI = 1.01-1.04), having secondary/higher education (AOR = 1.93, CI = 1.58-2.37), living in a rich household (AOR = 1.32, CI = 1.14-1.53), short distance to health facility (AOR = 1.18, CI = 1.06-1.31), high community education (AOR = 1.38, CI = 1.17-1.62), high community exposure to family planning messages (AOR = 1.24, CI = 1.08-1.42), and communities with high proportion of women working (AOR = 1.22, CI = 1.06-1.39) were more likely to use modern contraceptives.

conclusionThe study revealed that both individual and community factors were important in explaining the factors associated with modern contraceptive use among married women in Uganda. Therefore, there is need to invest in community based programs like: family planning outreach services, mass media campaigns and community mobilization activities to help in dissemination of family planning information, increase awareness and promotion in use of modern contraceptives. Also, expansion of higher education and the need to make family planning services available and accessible to areas with limited physical access to health facilities will lead to sustained increase in uptake of modern contraceptives.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsMarriageAgedChildContraceptionContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansUgandaContraceptive AgentsCommunityMarried womenModern contraceptivesUganda

Identifiers

PMID34315436
PMCPMC8314485
OpenAlexW3186883350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.