SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021
Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Association of Hospital Characteristics with Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.Research square · 2026Article
- Risk of moderate or severe hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy does not correlate with prenatally known risk factors.Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie · 2025Article
- Exploring the influence of medical staffing and birth volume on observed-to-expected cesarean deliveries: a panel data analysis of integrated obstetric and gynecological departments in Germany.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025Article
- Are racial and ethnic disparities in brachial plexus birth injuries explained by known risk factors?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- Delivery unit volume and neonatal mortality - A nationwide register study in Finland from 2008 to 2023.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- [The Effect of Service Concentration on Outcome Quality in Obstetrics Departments - An Empirical Analysis of Newborn Mortality in German Hospitals].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2025Article
- Assessing the Impact of Distance Traveled and Birth Volumes of Hospital Maternity Units on Newborn Outcomes: Population-Based Cohort Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter?Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Intrapartum Quality of Care among Healthy Women: A Population-Based Cohort Study in an Italian Region.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Navigating geographical disparities: access to obstetric hospitals in maternity care deserts and across the United States.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- [Perinatal Networks: Ensuring Regional Care of Pregnant Woman and Newborns].Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie · 2024Article
- Efficiency of Obstetric Services in Germany-The Role of Variation and Overheads.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The causal effect of delivery volume on severe maternal morbidity: an instrumental variable analysis in Sichuan, China.BMJ global health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is convincing evidence that birth in hospitals with high birth volumes increases the chance of healthy survival in high-risk infants. However, it is unclear whether this is true also for low risk infants. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze effects of hospital's birth volume on mortality, mode of delivery, readmissions, complications and subsequent developmental delays in all births or predefined low risk birth cohorts. The search strategy included EMBASE and Medline supplemented by citing and cited literature of included studies and expert panel highlighting additional literature, published between January/2000 and February/2020. We included studies which were published in English or German language reporting effects of birth volumes on mortality in term or all births in countries with neonatal mortality < 5/1000. We undertook a double-independent title-abstract- and full-text screening and extraction of study characteristics, critical appraisal and outcomes in a qualitative evidence synthesis.
results13 retrospective studies with mostly acceptable quality were included. Heterogeneous volume-thresholds, risk adjustments, outcomes and populations hindered a meta-analysis. Qualitatively, four of six studies reported significantly higher perinatal mortality in lower birth volume hospitals. Volume-outcome effects on neonatal mortality (n = 7), stillbirths (n = 3), maternal mortality (n = 1), caesarean sections (n = 2), maternal (n = 1) and neonatal complications (n = 1) were inconclusive.
conclusionAnalyzed studies indicate higher rates of perinatal mortality for low risk birth in hospitals with low birth volumes. Due to heterogeneity of studies, data synthesis was complicated and a meta-analysis was not possible. Therefore international core outcome sets should be defined and implemented in perinatal registries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42018095289.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.