Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34315285›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021

National Trends in Heart Donor Usage Rates: Are We Efficiently Transplanting More Hearts?

Naga Dharmavaram, Timothy Hess, Heather Jaeger, Jason Smith, Joshua Hermsen, David Murray, Ravi Dhingra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Right ventricle remodelling: fromJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naga DharmavaramDepartment of Medicine University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Madison WI.
Timothy HessDepartment of Medicine University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Madison WI.
Heather JaegerCardiopulmonary Transplant University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Madison WI.
Jason SmithDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison WI.
Joshua HermsenDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison WI.
David MurrayDepartment of Medicine University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Madison WI.
Ravi DhingraDepartment of Medicine University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Madison WI.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUW Health University Hospital · US

Funding

Training Program in Translational Cardiovascular Science (TPTCS)T32HL007936 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lee Lochbaum Eckhardt, Gail A Robertson · 2001 to 2026
$11.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background It is unclear whether the recent increase in the number of heart transplants performed annually in the United States is only because of higher availability of donors and if it affected recipients' survival. Methods and Results We examined characteristics of donors and recipients from 2008 to 2012 (n=11 654) and 2013 to 2017 (n=14 556) and compared them with 2003 to 2007 (n=10 869). Cox models examined 30-day and 1-year risk of recipients' death post transplant. From 2013 to 2017, there was an increase in the number of transplanted hearts and number of donor offers but an overall decline in the ratio of hearts transplanted to available donors. Donors between 2013 and 2017 were older, heavier, more hypertensive, diabetic, and likely to have abused illicit drugs compared with previous years. Drug overdose and hepatitis C positive donors were additional contributors to donor risk in recent years. In Cox models, risk of death post transplant between 2013 and 2017 was 15% lower at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98) and 21% lower at 1 year (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.87) and between 2008 and 2012 was 9% lower at 30 days (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.05) and 14% lower at 1 year (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94) compared with 2003 to 2007. Conclusions Despite a substantial increase in heart donor offers in recent years, the ratio of transplants performed to available donors has decreased. Even though hearts from donors who are older, more hypertensive, and have diabetes mellitus are being used, overall recipient survival continues to improve. Broader acceptance of drug overdose and hepatitis C positive donors may increase the number and percentage of heart transplants further without jeopardizing short-term outcomes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCause of DeathChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualDonor SelectionDrug OverdoseFemaleHeart FailureHeart TransplantationHepatitis CHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalecardiac failurecardiac transplantationdonor exclusiondonor screening

Identifiers

PMID34315285
PMCPMC8475695
OpenAlexW3185575832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.