ArticlePsycho-oncology2022
Cancer patient perspective in the arena of COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on good clinical practice trials in oncology.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Reducing barriers to care in the treatment of lung cancer: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- The evolution of patient-reported safety concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic within a series of study questionnaires: a multi-method analysis.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025Article
- The Experience of COVID-19 in a Sample of Gynecological Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Focus on the Psychological Implications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Use of Online Health Forums by People Living With Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Thematic Analysis.JMIR cancer · 2023Article
- Cancer Patients during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mini-Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Experiences of patients with cancer and their relatives confronted with COVID-19 related delay or change in care: A qualitative study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2022Article
- Decision Conflicts in Clinical Care during COVID-19: A Patient Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A year of pandemic for European particle radiotherapy: A survey on behalf of EPTN working group.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2022Article
- Organisation of cancer care in troubling times: A scoping review of expert guidelines and their implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic.Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2022Article
- Cancer patient perspective in the arena of COVID-19 pandemic.Psycho-oncology · 2022Article
- Perceptions and practices of people with a total laryngectomy during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods analysis.American journal of otolaryngologyArticle
- Evaluation of mental disorder related to colposcopy procedure during the COVID period: A cross-sectional study.Women's health (London, England)Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has been declared a global pandemic of unprecedented proportions. Italy is a country which has been heavily affected. Cancer patients are at a higher risk owing to their intrinsic fragility related to their underlying disease and oncologic treatment. Against this backdrop, we conducted a survey to investigate how patients perceived their condition, clinical management and availability of information during the pandemic.
methodsBetween 15 April and 1 May 2020 a survey was submitted to cancer patients at oncology departments in the Marche region. Questions regarding the perception of personal safety, continuity of cancer care, information quality and psychological distress.
resultsSeven hundred patients participated in the survey; 59% were female and 40% were aged between 46 and 65. The majority of the participants perceived compliance with appropriate safety standards by cancer care providers and 80% were reassured about their concerns during the medical interview. 40% were worried of being at a higher risk of infection and 71% felt they were at a greater risk because of chemotherapy. 55% felt that postponing cancer treatment could reduce its efficacy, however 76% declared they did not feel abandoned at the time of treatment postponement. Patients between 46 and 65 years declared a significant reduction in sleep (p < 0.01) and in concentration (p = 0.03).
conclusionsThe emergency care offered to cancer patients has been deemed satisfactory in terms of both safety standards and care management. However, the majority of participants perceived the mutual negative influence between their oncologic disease and the risk of infection highlighting the need for special measures to ensure safe continuity of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.