ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021
Proof-of-concept for x-ray based real-time image guidance during cardiac radioablation.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application and Development of Spectral CT in Target Delineation for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An open-source deep learning framework for respiratory motion monitoring and volumetric imaging during radiation therapy.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac radioablation offers non-invasive treatments for refractory arrhythmias. However, treatment delivery for this technique remains challenging. In this paper, we introduce the first method for real-time image guidance during cardiac radioablation for refractory atrial fibrillation on a standard linear accelerator. Our proposed method utilizes direct diaphragm tracking on intrafraction images to estimate the respiratory component of cardiac substructure motion. We compare this method to treatment scenarios without real-time image guidance using the 4D-XCAT digital phantom. Pre-treatment and intrafraction imaging was simulated for 8 phantoms with unique anatomies programmed using cardiorespiratory motion from healthy volunteers. As every voxel in the 4D-XCAT phantom is labelled precisely according to the corresponding anatomical structure, this provided ground-truth for quantitative evaluation. Tracking performance was compared to the ground-truth for simulations with and without real-time image guidance using the left atrium as an exemplar target. Differences in target volume size, mean volumetric coverage, minimum volumetric coverage and geometric error were recorded for each simulation. We observed that differences in target volume size were statistically significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.