Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34314880›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2021

Next-Generation Sequencing Concordance Analysis of Comprehensive Solid Tumor Profiling between a Centralized Specialty Laboratory and the Decentralized Personal Genome Diagnostics elio Tissue Complete Kitted Solution.

Kristen L Deak, Jennifer B Jackson, Kenneth C Valkenburg, Laurel A Keefer, Kelly M Robinson Gerding, Samuel V Angiuoli, Michael B Datto, Shannon J McCall

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treatment Response Evaluation by Ultra-Deep Sequencing of Cell-Free DNA and Matched White Blood Cells.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  3. The Future of Precision Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristen L DeakDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: kristen.deak@duke.edu.
Jennifer B JacksonPersonal Genome Diagnostics, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: jjackson@pgdx.com.
Kenneth C ValkenburgPersonal Genome Diagnostics, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland.
Laurel A KeeferPersonal Genome Diagnostics, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland.
Kelly M Robinson GerdingPersonal Genome Diagnostics, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland.
Samuel V AngiuoliPersonal Genome Diagnostics, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael B DattoDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Shannon J McCallDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic tumor profiling by next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows for large-scale tumor testing to inform targeted cancer therapies and immunotherapies, and to identify patients for clinical trials. These tests are often underutilized in patients with late-stage solid tumors and are typically performed in centralized specialty laboratories, thereby limiting access to these complex tests. Personal Genome Diagnostics Inc., elio tissue complete NGS solution is a comprehensive DNA-to-report kitted assay and bioinformatics solution. Comparison of 147 unique specimens from >20 tumor types was performed using the elio tissue complete solution and Foundation Medicine's FoundationOne test, which is of similar size and gene content. The analytical performance of all genomic variant types was evaluated. In general, the overall mutational profile is highly concordant between the two assays, with agreement in sequence variants reported between panels demonstrating >95% positive percentage agreement for single-nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions in clinically actionable genes. Both copy number alterations and gene translocations showed 80% to 83% positive percentage agreement, whereas tumor mutation burden and microsatellite status showed a high level of concordance across a range of mutation loads and tumor types. The Personal Genome Diagnostics Inc., elio tissue complete assay is comparable to the FoundationOne test and will allow more laboratories to offer a diagnostic NGS assay in house, which will ultimately reduce time to result and increase the number of patients receiving molecular genomic profiling and personalized treatment.

Indexed as

LaboratoriesBiomarkers, TumorDNA Copy Number VariationsGenetic TestingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansINDEL MutationMicrosatellite InstabilityNeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNABiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID34314880
PMCPMC8567158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.