Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34314862›Full record

ArticlePhotodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy2021

The impact of delayed anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for retinal diseases during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Muhammed Nurullah Bulut, Hatice Selen Sönmez, Gizem Gökçe, Anıl Ağaçkesen, Kezban Bulut, Aynur Hacısalihoğlu, Aysu Arsan, Şaban Şimşek

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammed Nurullah BulutUniversity of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, Eye Department, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: muhammednurullah.bulut@sbu.edu.tr.
Hatice Selen SönmezUniversity of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, Eye Department, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gizem GökçeUniversity of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, Eye Department, Istanbul, Turkey.
Anıl AğaçkesenUniversity of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, Eye Department, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kezban BulutUniversity of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, Eye Department, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aynur HacısalihoğluUniversity of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, Eye Department, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aysu ArsanUniversity of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, Eye Department, Istanbul, Turkey.
Şaban ŞimşekUniversity of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, Eye Department, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRDr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the clinical status of treatment-naive patients who had to delay 3-dose loading anti-VEGF (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor) injections during the COVID-19 lockdown, and to evaluate the effect of the delayed visual acuity treatment on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) parameters.

methodA total of 55 eyes of 46 patients who were received in the study period participated in this retrospective study, including 28 patients (37 eyes) with diabetic macular edema (DME), 11 patients (11 eyes) with retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and 7 patients (7 eyes) with wet age-related macular degeneration (wet-AMD). The patients were diagnosed with DME, RVO, or wet-AMD in February 2020 and had planned 3-dose loading injections in March, April, and May 2020, but could not be injected due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsFrom the patients' initial examination in February 2020, the mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.72 ± 59 logMAR. After the patients' lockdown visit in July 2020, the mean BCVA was 0.76 ± 64 logMAR. BCVA was stable in 11 eyes, decreased in 12 eyes, and increased in 14 eyes for patients with DME. BCVA was stable in 6, decreased in 3, and increased in 2 eyes for patients with RVO, and it was stable in 4 eyes and decreased in 3 eyes for patients with wet-AMD.

conclusionWe concluded that 6-month delay in treatment of DME patients with non-proliferative DRP had no adverse effect on the visual acuity. However, the loading dose in wet-AMD and RVO patients should be applied as soon as possible.

Indexed as

COVID-19Diabetic RetinopathyMacular EdemaPhotochemotherapyRetinal DiseasesAngiogenesis InhibitorsCommunicable Disease ControlHumansIntravitreal InjectionsPandemicsPhotosensitizing AgentsRanibizumabRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Tomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeAngiogenesis InhibitorsPhotosensitizing AgentsRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnti-VEGFCOVID-19DelayingDiabetic retinopathyLoading doseOCTTreatment delay

Identifiers

PMID34314862
PMCPMC8305215
OpenAlexW3186987227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.