Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34314834›Full record

Observational studyJournal of vascular surgery2022

Machine learning analysis of multispectral imaging and clinical risk factors to predict amputation wound healing.

John J Squiers, Jeffrey E Thatcher, David S Bastawros, Andrew J Applewhite, Ronald D Baxter, Faliu Yi, Peiran Quan, Shuai Yu, J Michael DiMaio, Dennis R Gable

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of vascular surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Photoacoustic monitoring of angiogenesis predicts response to therapy in healing wounds.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John J SquiersDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital, Plano, Tex.
Jeffrey E ThatcherSpectral MD, Dallas, Tex.
David S BastawrosDepartment of Podiatry, Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital, Plano, Tex.
Andrew J ApplewhiteDepartment of Wound Care, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.
Ronald D BaxterDepartment of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.
Faliu YiSpectral MD, Dallas, Tex.
Peiran QuanSpectral MD, Dallas, Tex.
Shuai YuSpectral MD, Dallas, Tex.
J Michael DiMaioDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital, Plano, Tex.
Dennis R GableDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital, Plano, Tex; Department of Vascular Surgery, Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital, Plano, Tex. Electronic address: dennis.gable@bswhealth.org.
Baylor Medical Center at Garland · USSpectral MD (United States) · USBaylor University Medical Center · US

Funding

Non-invasive device to assist selecting the level-of-amputation in patients with peripheral arterial diseaseR43HL142428 · NHLBI · SPECTRAL MD, INC. · PI THATCHER, JEFFREY E. · 2018 to 2019
$252k
NHLBI NIH HHS R43 HL142428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrediction of amputation wound healing is challenging due to the multifactorial nature of critical limb ischemia and lack of objective assessment tools. Up to one-third of amputations require revision to a more proximal level within 1 year. We tested a novel wound imaging system to predict amputation wound healing at initial evaluation.

methodsPatients planned to undergo amputation due to critical limb ischemia were prospectively enrolled. Clinicians evaluated the patients in traditional fashion, and all clinical decisions for amputation level were determined by the clinician's judgement. Multispectral images of the lower extremity were obtained preoperatively using a novel wound imaging system. Clinicians were blinded to the machine analysis. A standardized wound healing assessment was performed on postoperative day 30 by physical exam to determine whether the amputation site achieved complete healing. If operative revision or higher level of amputation was required, this was undertaken based solely upon the provider's clinical judgement. A machine learning algorithm combining the multispectral imaging data with patient clinical risk factors was trained and tested using cross-validation to measure the wound imaging system's accuracy of predicting amputation wound healing.

resultsA total of 22 patients undergoing 25 amputations (10 toe, five transmetatarsal, eight below-knee, and two above-knee amputations) were enrolled. Eleven amputations (44%) were non-healing after 30 days. The machine learning algorithm had 91% sensitivity and 86% specificity for prediction of non-healing amputation sites (area under curve, 0.89).

conclusionsThis pilot study suggests that a machine learning algorithm combining multispectral wound imaging with patient clinical risk factors may improve prediction of amputation wound healing and therefore decrease the need for reoperation and incidence of delayed healing. We propose that this, in turn, may offer significant cost savings to the patient and health system in addition to decreasing length of stay for patients.

Indexed as

Hyperspectral ImagingMachine LearningAgedAmputation, SurgicalChronic Limb-Threatening IschemiaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPrognosisProspective StudiesRegional Blood FlowRisk AssessmentCritical limb ischemiaLower extremity amputationMachine learningMultispectral imaging

Identifiers

PMID34314834
PMCPMC8712350
OpenAlexW3112630029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.