Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34314551›Full record

ArticleMusculoskeletal care2022

Understanding peer mentorship in supporting self-management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative study of mentees' perspectives.

Elizabeth C Lavender, Anna M Anderson, Esther Dusabe-Richards, Deborah Antcliff, Sarah R Kingsbury, Philip G Conaghan, Gretl A McHugh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Musculoskeletal care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Adapting an Osteoarthritis Peer Mentorship Intervention for Remote Delivery to People Experiencing Socioeconomic Disadvantage: A Multi-Method Approach.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth C LavenderSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0226-8847
Anna M AndersonSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4048-6880
Esther Dusabe-RichardsSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3568-9023
Deborah AntcliffSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9771-8232
Sarah R KingsburyLeeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9917-1269
Philip G ConaghanLeeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3478-5665
Gretl A McHughSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5766-5885
University of Leeds · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) are common musculoskeletal conditions. Treatment is usually conservative, making self-management a priority. We developed and trialled an OA peer mentorship intervention to support self-management in older people. Our objectives were to gain understanding of the perceived challenges of living with OA and explore how a peer mentorship intervention can support tackling these challenges; and to explore mentees' experiences of receiving the intervention to understand how this affected their OA self-management.

methodsQualitative semi-structured interviews focussing on acceptability and feasibility of being in the study were conducted with mentees. Transcribed interviews were double coded and subject to framework analysis. To address the objectives of this paper, three main themes were subject to focused analysis: mentees' experiences of OA, experience of peer mentorship support and factors influencing self-management.

resultsSeventeen mentees participated in an interview following completion of the peer support intervention. Themes emerging from focused analysis were the following: tackling the challenges of living with OA pre- and post-intervention; and the interplay of the peer mentorship intervention and self-management. Key elements of the latter theme are enabling factors provided by peer mentorship, and mentees' readiness to self-manage.

conclusionTo effectively support OA self-management, peer mentorship interventions should include core educational components and focus on strategies that enhance key enablers of self-management. Paying attention to the mentor-mentee relationship and timing of intervention engagement can maximise opportunities for older people to adjust and transition from supported to independent self-management.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneeSelf-ManagementAgedHumansMentorsPeer Groupinterventionmenteeosteoarthritispeer mentorshipqualitative studyself-management

Identifiers

PMID34314551
PMCPMC9290819
OpenAlexW3185566332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.