Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34314455›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada.

Kathleen Murphy, Karina Branje, Tara White, Ashlee Cunsolo, Margot Latimer, Jane McMillan, John R Sylliboy, Shelley McKibbon, Debbie Martin

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Culturally and structurally competent approaches to health research with Black communities in Atlantic Canada: a rapid review.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Indigenous gender and wellness: a scoping review of Canadian research.International journal of circumpolar health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen MurphyFaculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5332-088X
Karina BranjeFaculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2595-2345
Tara WhiteFaculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7989-2106
Ashlee CunsoloSchool of Arctic and Sub-Arctic Studies, Labrador Institute of Memorial University, Memorial University, Happy Valley-Goose Bay, Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada.
Margot LatimerFaculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jane McMillanDepartment of Anthropology, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada.
John R SylliboyDepartment of Integrated Studies in Education (DISE), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3016-5298
Shelley McKibbonKellogg Health Sciences Library, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Debbie MartinFaculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAMcGill University · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CASt. Francis Xavier University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParticipatory research involving community engagement is considered the gold standard in Indigenous health research. However, it is sometimes unclear whether and how Indigenous communities are engaged in research that impacts them, and whether and how engagement is reported. Indigenous health research varies in its degree of community engagement from minimal involvement to being community-directed and led. Research led and directed by Indigenous communities can support reconciliation and reclamation in Canada and globally, however clearer reporting and understandings of community-led research is needed. This scoping review assesses (a) how and to what extent researchers are reporting community engagement in Indigenous health research in Atlantic Canada, and (b) what recommendations exist in the literature regarding participatory and community-led research.

methodsEleven databases were searched using keywords for Indigeneity, geographic regions, health, and Indigenous communities in Atlantic Canada between 2001-June 2020. Records were independently screened by two reviewers and were included if they were: peer-reviewed; written in English; health-related; and focused on Atlantic Canada. Data were extracted using a piloted data charting form, and a descriptive and thematic analysis was performed. 211 articles were retained for inclusion.

resultsFew empirical articles reported community engagement in all aspects of the research process. Most described incorporating community engagement at the project's onset and/or during data collection; only a few articles explicitly identified as entirely community-directed or led. Results revealed a gap in reported capacity-building for both Indigenous communities and researchers, necessary for holistic community engagement. Also revealed was the need for funding bodies, ethics boards, and peer review processes to better facilitate participatory and community-led Indigenous health research.

conclusionAs Indigenous communities continue reclaiming sovereignty over identities and territories, participatory research must involve substantive, agreed-upon involvement of Indigenous communities, with community-directed and led research as the ultimate goal.

Indexed as

ResearchCanadaDatabases, FactualDelivery of Health CareHumansIndigenous Peoples

Identifiers

PMID34314455
PMCPMC8315539
OpenAlexW3184821010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.