ArticlePloS one2021
Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Indigenous participation in pediatric Indigenous health research in Canada: a systematic review.Pediatric research · 2023Pooled it
- Inequities in access to palliative care and community-based indigenous palliative care programs in Canada: a scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Partnerships and practices: a scoping review of engaging older adults living with frailty in the research process.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Review
- Where to Next for Māori Health Research Review Processes? Insights Into the Indigenous Context: An Integrative Systematic Literature Review.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026Review
- How do global health research actors conceptualise inclusion in response to decolonisation calls? A scoping review.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Culturally and structurally competent approaches to health research with Black communities in Atlantic Canada: a rapid review.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025Review
- Understanding the experiences of young, urban, Indigenous mothers-to-be in British Columbia, Canada.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Observational
- Qualitative genomic research with Indigenous peoples: a scoping review of participatory practice.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Indigenous gender and wellness: a scoping review of Canadian research.International journal of circumpolar health · 2023Article
- Article
- Lessons from First Nations partnerships in hepatitis C research and the co-creation of knowledge.Canadian liver journal · 2023Article
- Community Participation in Primary Healthcare in the South Sudan Boma Health Initiative: A Document Analysis.International journal of health policy and management · 2022Review
- Shifting paradigm from biomedical to decolonised methods in Inuit public health research in Canada: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- A methodological protocol for conducting a scoping review of health research on/by/with Indigenous women in North America.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Community-responsive scholar-activist research: conceptualizing capacity building and sustainability in a Northern California community-university partnership.Journal of community practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionParticipatory research involving community engagement is considered the gold standard in Indigenous health research. However, it is sometimes unclear whether and how Indigenous communities are engaged in research that impacts them, and whether and how engagement is reported. Indigenous health research varies in its degree of community engagement from minimal involvement to being community-directed and led. Research led and directed by Indigenous communities can support reconciliation and reclamation in Canada and globally, however clearer reporting and understandings of community-led research is needed. This scoping review assesses (a) how and to what extent researchers are reporting community engagement in Indigenous health research in Atlantic Canada, and (b) what recommendations exist in the literature regarding participatory and community-led research.
methodsEleven databases were searched using keywords for Indigeneity, geographic regions, health, and Indigenous communities in Atlantic Canada between 2001-June 2020. Records were independently screened by two reviewers and were included if they were: peer-reviewed; written in English; health-related; and focused on Atlantic Canada. Data were extracted using a piloted data charting form, and a descriptive and thematic analysis was performed. 211 articles were retained for inclusion.
resultsFew empirical articles reported community engagement in all aspects of the research process. Most described incorporating community engagement at the project's onset and/or during data collection; only a few articles explicitly identified as entirely community-directed or led. Results revealed a gap in reported capacity-building for both Indigenous communities and researchers, necessary for holistic community engagement. Also revealed was the need for funding bodies, ethics boards, and peer review processes to better facilitate participatory and community-led Indigenous health research.
conclusionAs Indigenous communities continue reclaiming sovereignty over identities and territories, participatory research must involve substantive, agreed-upon involvement of Indigenous communities, with community-directed and led research as the ultimate goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.