Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34314437›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

The burden of scrub typhus in India: A systematic review.

Emily Devasagayam, Divya Dayanand, Debasree Kundu, Mohan S Kamath, Richard Kirubakaran, George M Varghese

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
20.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Global and regional seroprevalence, incidence, mortality of, and risk factors for scrub typhus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Imaging in scrub typhus - a pictorial review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Epidemiological Trends and Patterns of Scrub Typhus in India: A Retrospective Analysis Based on Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) Data (2009-2018).Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily DevasagayamDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Divya DayanandDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Debasree KunduDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2676-4936
Mohan S KamathDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Richard KirubakaranSouth Asian Cochrane Network and Centre, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5799-0303
George M VargheseDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4040-5649
Christian Medical College, Vellore · IN

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScrub typhus, a vector-borne zoonotic infection caused by the bacteria Orientia tsutsugamushi, is one of the most common and clinically important rickettsial infections worldwide. An estimated one million cases occur annually with a high case fatality rate. Although scrub typhus is a major public health threat in India, the burden and distribution remains unclear. We aimed to estimate the burden of scrub typhus in India. METHODOLOGY: We performed a systematic review of published literature on scrub typhus from India to extract information on epidemiology, morbidity, and mortality. Important databases were searched using keywords and appropriate combinations. We identified observational, interventional, and population-based studies and extracted the data to evaluate the number of cases diagnosed using serology or PCR and the number of deaths due to scrub typhus. We conducted a systematic narrative synthesis to summarize included studies. PRINCIPAL

findingsIn the last decade, there were 18,781 confirmed scrub typhus cases reported in 138 hospital-based studies and two community-based studies. IgM ELISA was used in 122 studies to confirm the cases in majority (89%). The proportion of scrub typhus among acute undifferentiated febrile illness (AUFI) studies was 25.3%, and community seroprevalence was 34.2%. Ninety studies had data published on multiple organ involvement out of which 17.4% of cases had multiple organ dysfunction syndromes, 20.4% patients required ICU admission, and 19.1% needed ventilation. The overall case-fatality rate was 6.3%, and the mortality among those with multi-organ dysfunction syndrome was as high as 38.9%. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Scrub typhus, a common acute febrile illness in India causing severe morbidity, accounts for a large number of deaths. The burden of the disease has been underappreciated. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment can significantly reduce complications and mortality. Establishing good surveillance and instituting appropriate control measures are urgently needed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCost of IllnessHumansIndiaScrub TyphusZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID34314437
PMCPMC8345853
OpenAlexW3184789847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.