Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34314417›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Experiences, challenges and perspectives for ensuring end-of-life patient care: A national online survey with general practitioners in Germany.

Jannik M Tielker, Jan P Weber, Steffen T Simon, Claudia Bausewein, Stephanie Stiel, Nils Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Dying during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Sweden: Relatives' Experiences of End-of-Life Care (the CO-LIVE Study).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jannik M TielkerInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Jan P WeberInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Steffen T SimonDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Claudia BauseweinDepartment for Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Stephanie StielInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5963-2526
Nils SchneiderInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic is posing major challenges for health care systems. In Germany, one such challenge has been that adequate palliative care for the severely ill and dying (with and without COVID-19), as well as their loved ones, has not been available at all times and in all settings., the pandemic has underlined the significance of the contribution of general practitioners (GPs) to the care of severely ill and dying patients.

objectivesTo describe GPs' experiences, challenges and perspectives with respect to end-of-life care during the first peak of the pandemic (spring 2020) in Germany. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn November and December 2020, a link to an Unipark online survey was sent to GPs registered on nationwide distribution lists.

resultsIn total, 410 GPs responded; 61.5% indicated that the quality of their patients' end-of-life care was maintained throughout the pandemic, 36.8% reported a decrease in quality compared to pre-pandemic times. Of the GPs who made home visits to severely ill and dying patients, 61.4% reported a stable number of visits, 28.5% reported fewer visits. 62.7% of the GPs reported increased telephone contact and reduced personal contact with patients; 36.1% offered video consultations in lieu of face-to-face contact. The GPs reported that relatives were restricted (48.5%) or prohibited from visiting (33.4%) patients in nursing homes. They observed a fear of loneliness among patients in nursing homes (91.9%), private homes (87.3%) and hospitals (86.1%).

conclusionsThe present work provides insights into the pandemic management of GPs and supports the development of a national strategy for palliative care during a pandemic. To effectively address end-of-life care, GPs and palliative care specialists should be involved in COVID-19 task forces on micro, meso and macro levels of health care.

Indexed as

General PractitionersAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19FemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesTelephoneTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID34314417
PMCPMC8315495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.