Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34314298›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of dermatological treatment2022

A qualitative study of dermatology patients and providers to understand discordant perceptions of symptom burden and disease severity.

C E Ellie Choi, M Y Fiona Yee, L Y Laura Tan, Phillip Phan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of dermatological treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C E Ellie ChoiDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2059-3478
M Y Fiona YeeYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
L Y Laura TanMinistry of Health Holdings, Singapore, Singapore.
Phillip PhanJohns Hopkins Carey Business School, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1366-1604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients often present with symptoms that are disproportionate to the observed disease state, and grade disease severity differently from healthcare providers (HPs). This discordant symptom burden and severity grading (DSG) results in poorer patient care. Current research on DSG is limited, relying on structured models that are theoretically incomplete.

objectiveTo fully understand the factors driving DSG.

methodsQualitative study of dermatology patients and HPs. Interview data were analyzed using grounded theory to derive a model of the causes of DSG.

resultsEighteen patients and 12 HPs were interviewed. Results reflect a tendency for patients to grade their conditions more severely than HPs. Factors driving DSG are related to emotional and cognitive disparities in the constructs used to grade severity, varying consequences of disease due to differing resilience and coping methods, socio-psychological factors influencing how patients report their symptoms, and the context of the consult.

conclusionA better understanding of DSG is required for achieving mutual understanding and patient-centered collaborative care. It is easy to label a patient with high symptom burden as having a low threshold for discomfort, or for a patient to presume that the doctor is unempathetic. This study suggests the causes of DSG are nuanced and multifactorial.

Indexed as

DermatologyHealth PersonnelHumansPatient AcuityQualitative ResearchSeverity of Illness Indexbehavioral medicineDiscordant severity gradinghealth services researchqualitative researchsymptom burden

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.